| Title: |
A data compilation and synthesis of the impacts of seismic surveys on surface soil properties in boreal Alberta, Canada. |
| Authors: |
Davies, Marissa A.; Davidson, Scott J.; Deane, Patrick J.; Filicetti, Angelo; Ketcheson, Scott; Korsah, Percy; Kleinke, Kimberly; Nielsen, Scott E.; Schmidt, Megan A.; Tabassum, Nazia; Waddington, James M.; Weiland, Lelia; Wilkinson, Sophie; Strack, Maria |
| Source: |
Canadian Journal of Forest Research; 2/28/2025, Vol. 55, p1-18, 18p |
| Subject Terms: |
Soil degradation; Geophysical surveys; Natural gas prospecting; Soil surveys; Seismic surveys |
| Abstract: |
Linear clearings of vegetation to perform geophysical surveys, called seismic lines, are created for oil and gas exploration in boreal Canada and often persist on the landscape for decades after disturbance. Therefore, an assessment of environmental conditions on seismic lines is needed to inform restoration efforts. This study aimed to compile surface soil properties (upper 5–15 cm; dry bulk density, organic matter content, organic matter bulk density, volumetric water content, and water content by mass) on and off seismic lines across upland, transitional, and peatland ecosystems in northern Alberta, Canada (N = 1638). Soil properties differ between seismic line and reference samples, especially on older "conventional" lines. Changes included higher dry bulk density, lower organic matter content, and elimination of microtopographic variability. Changes in dry bulk density can, in part, be explained by a reduction in organic matter content, but altered carbon cycling and/or compaction are also important. Restoration techniques such as inverted mounding create an entirely distinct soil condition, with higher mean bulk densities and lower organic matter contents than both on and off seismic lines. Therefore, an assessment of microtopographic recovery should be conducted before prescribing restoration treatments to limit further degradation of soil structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| : |
Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |