| Title: |
Forensic‐Based and Environmentally Responsible Protocol to Manage Shark Fatal Bites on Humans Can Better Contribute to Conservation Needs. |
| Authors: |
Clua, Eric E. G.1,2,3 (AUTHOR) eric.clua@ephe.psl.eu; Baksay, Sandra4 (AUTHOR); Bidenbach, Hadrien3 (AUTHOR); Bartoli, Blaise5 (AUTHOR); Lacroix, Bertrand3 (AUTHOR); Vely, Michel6,7 (AUTHOR); Freeman, Mark8 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Aquatic Conservation. Feb2025, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p1-7. 7p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Predatory aquatic animals; *Marine ecology; Body size; Archaeological human remains; Forensic sciences |
| Abstract: |
Although sharks are important for marine ecosystems, they still suffer culling campaigns after human fatalities. A case study from the Caribbean shows how the rapid use of several complementary and reproducible forensic techniques not only allowed the confirmation of the species implicated in the bite but also the accurate assessment of the size of the animal. Six non‐lethal fishing sessions led to the capture of several shark individuals that were released after either being eliminated due to their unsuitable size or the absence of human remains in their stomach. Such an ecologically responsible risk management can contribute to shark conservation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| : |
Copyright of Aquatic Conservation is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
GreenFILE |