| Title: |
Feasibility of remote measurement in intensive longitudinal data collection for rheumatoid arthritis patients commencing a new treatment. |
| Authors: |
Tung, Hsiu Yen; Galloway, James; Matcham, Faith; Boalch, Amy; Shand, Ginny; Norton, Sam |
| Source: |
Rheumatology Advances in Practice; 2025, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p1-10, 10p |
| Subject Terms: |
Rheumatoid arthritis; Biotherapy; Wearable technology; Qualitative research; Repeated measures design; Telemetry; Symptoms |
| Abstract: |
Objectives This article aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of intensive assessment of symptoms in RA patients starting a new biologic treatment. Methods Participant symptoms and experiences were collected six times a day for 14 days and once a day for 16 days in a single cohort. Wearable devices were also given to participants to track sleep and physical activity. Qualitative interviews were conducted to provide feedback regarding the acceptability of methods. Recruitment and completion rates were used to test for feasibility. The mean and variability of data for each day were calculated to reflect on data quality. Qualitative interview data were analysed by deductive thematic analysis. Results Of the 110 patients approached, 27 (15.5%) could not be contacted and 12 (14.5%) were excluded due to meeting exclusion criteria. Of 71 contactable and eligible participants, 31 (43.7%) joined the study. The survey completion rate was 74.6% (1943/2604) for the first 14 days, ranging from 10.7 to 100%. Completion rates for days 15–30 ranged from 60 to 83%. Mean levels of severity of symptoms (pain, fatigue, joint stiffness) showed a decrease after treatment, as expected. Qualitative interviews demonstrated that participants reported a positive experience that was not overly burdensome. Surveys were described as quick and easy to complete, but repetitive for some participants. Discussion Recruitment and completion rates were acceptable and comparable to similar studies in the field. Qualitative analysis showed largely positive reviews from participants with feedback mainly focusing on survey timings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| : |
Copyright of Rheumatology Advances in Practice is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |