Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Supplemental Index kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Riverscape genetics of nonnative Brook Trout to inform native cutthroat trout conservation.

Title: Riverscape genetics of nonnative Brook Trout to inform native cutthroat trout conservation.
Authors: Stack, Taylor1 (AUTHOR) taylor.stack@colostate.edu; Harris, Audrey C2 (AUTHOR); Fairchild, Matthew P3 (AUTHOR); Oyler-McCance, Sara J4 (AUTHOR); Fike, Jennifer A4 (AUTHOR); Winkelman, Dana L1,5,6 (AUTHOR); Kanno, Yoichiro1,6 (AUTHOR)
Source: Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. Jan2026, Vol. 155 Issue 1, p26-40. 15p.
Abstract: Objective: Understanding how riverscape features influence gene flow is critical for managing population connectivity in freshwater species. We examined how landscape and stream characteristics shape the spatial genetic structure of nonnative Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis in a headwater stream network proposed for reintroduction of federally threatened Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus virginalis stomias. Brook Trout were studied to evaluate the suitability of this habitat for supporting a native trout metapopulation. Methods: We genotyped 757 Brook Trout from 22 sites across a 60-km stream network using 12 microsatellite loci. Spatial genetic structure was assessed using clustering analysis (program STRUCTURE) and pairwise differentiation metrics (FST and Jost's D). A spatial network modeling approach was used to quantify the effects of riverscape features (e.g., stream gradient, stream order, waterfalls, and flow direction) on trout gene flow. Results: Genetic clustering identified four distinct tributary groups, while estimates of pairwise genetic differentiation indicated some genetic connectivity across the network (mean FST = 0.04; mean Jost's D = 0.06). Trout gene flow was impeded by waterfalls, steep stream gradients, and increased hydrologic distance. Higher stream order and downstream flow direction were associated with stronger gene flow, and stream segments containing waterfalls and steeper gradients showed greater asymmetries between upstream and downstream gene flow. Conclusions: Brook Trout populations in this stream network are spatially structured, but gene flow persists and is mediated by physical riverscape features and hydrologic distance. The observed patterns of genetic connectivity suggest that this habitat can support connectivity among populations of reintroduced Greenback Cutthroat Trout. In future native trout reintroduction efforts, prioritizing habitats with gradual stream gradients and fewer waterfalls would promote population connectivity. Lay Summary: Riverscape features influence patterns of connectivity among invasive Brook Trout populations in a future native trout reintroduction area. Current levels of gene flow suggest that this habitat could support connected populations of reintroduced native trout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Supplemental Index