Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Complementary Index kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Integrated monitoring and lifecycle assessment of green hydrogen, ammonia, and synthetic fuels: Advancing environmental sustainability and carbon traceability in the clean energy transition.

Title: Integrated monitoring and lifecycle assessment of green hydrogen, ammonia, and synthetic fuels: Advancing environmental sustainability and carbon traceability in the clean energy transition.
Authors: Srinivasan, Senthil Kumar; Jayaraman, Srinivas; Sekar, Bharani Kumar; Rajendran, Ashok Kumar; Jayabal, Ravikumar; Prabhakar, Prajith
Source: Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy; Mar/Apr2026, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p1-18, 18p
Subject Terms: PRODUCT life cycle assessment; CARBON analysis; CLEAN energy; SYNTHETIC fuels; GREEN fuels; AMMONIA; SUSTAINABILITY; SCIENTIFIC apparatus & instruments
Abstract: Decarbonizing the global energy system requires clean fuel pathways that are low carbon at the point of use and sustainable throughout their lifecycles. This review compares green hydrogen (H2), green ammonia (NH3), and synthetic electrofuels (e‐fuels). It focuses on integrating advanced monitoring technologies and standardized life‐cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks. We critically examine contemporary monitoring techniques, including Raman spectroscopy, tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), fiber‐optic sensing, and AI‐enabled digital twins with SCADA systems. Their effectiveness is assessed for leak detection, fuel quality, emissions quantification, and operational safety across production, storage, transport, and end‐use phases. A synthesized cradle‐to‐grave and well‐to‐wheel LCA, consistent with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 and ISO 14044 standards, quantifies environmental performance and shows key sources of variability among the three energy carriers. The literature shows greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction potentials from about 70% to 98%, depending on electricity carbon intensity, production pathways, carbon dioxide (CO2) sourcing, and system boundary definitions. H2 offers the greatest decarbonization potential for industrial and grid‐scale applications. NH3 is useful for long‐distance transport and seasonal energy storage. E‐fuels, though less energy‐efficient, help facilitate near‐term adoption in hard‐to‐electrify sectors like aviation and maritime transport. Combining operational monitoring data with life‐cycle carbon accounting enables transparent, certification‐ready sustainability governance that aligns with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7, 9, and 13. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
: Copyright of Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index