Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Complementary Index kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target.

Title: Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target.
Authors: Fajardo, Javier; Bingham, Heather C.; Brockington, Dan; Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca; Fitzsimons, James A.; Fleischman, Forrest; Frechette, Alain; Garrett, Rachael D.; Hazin, Carolina; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Lessmann, Janeth; Nuvunga, Milagre O. F.; O'Donnell, Brian; Onyai, Fred; Pinto, Ruth; Pfeifer, Marion; Pritchard, Rose; Ryan, Casey M.; Shyamsundar, Priya; Tauli, Josefa Cariño
Source: Nature Communications; 5/12/2026, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p
Subject Terms: SOCIAL impact; PROTECTED areas; HUMAN Development Index; ENVIRONMENTAL protection; BIODIVERSITY; ANTHROPOGENIC effects on nature; POLICY analysis; INDIGENOUS peoples
Abstract: Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to increase global protected and conserved area coverage to at least 30% by 2030. The impact on people, whether positive or negative, will depend on the social context of additional areas and how they are governed and managed. Here, we show that Target 3 could affect large and socially diverse populations under different implementation scenarios. Nearly half the human population lives within 10 km of areas included in a scenario maximising biodiversity representation. Four percent live near areas included in an Indigenous and traditional territories-based scenario, including many in areas with low Human Development Index scores (74%) and high participation in wild harvesting (91%). A scenario prioritising nature's contributions to people is intermediate on all measures. Our results demonstrate that Target 3 is a highly ambitious social as well as ecological target, requiring an equally ambitious commitment to development funding and support for local residents. Different approaches to achieving Target 3 affect distinct and socially diverse populations. These contrasting socioeconomic contexts imply varying challenges and opportunities, underscoring the importance of context-specific, equitable implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
: Copyright of Nature Communications is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index