Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Complementary Index kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Prevalence and incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and adverse outcomes in patients receiving de novo and replacement pacemaker therapy for bradycardia.

Title: Prevalence and incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and adverse outcomes in patients receiving de novo and replacement pacemaker therapy for bradycardia.
Authors: Samad, Nurul H Abdul; Gierula, John; Lowry, Judith E; Straw, Sam; Relton, Samuel D; Kamalathasan, Stephe; Cubbon, Richard M; Kearney, Mark T; Witte, Klaus K; Paton, Maria F
Source: European Heart Journal Open; May2026, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p1-14, 14p
Abstract: Aims Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF). We investigated the prevalence and predictors of LVSD and adverse HF outcomes in patients undergoing de novo or replacement RVP for bradycardia. Methods and results Prospective data were collected from 1024 patients receiving de novo (2014–2017, n = 514) or generator replacement (2008–2011, n = 510) RVP at a UK tertiary centre. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of LVSD, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and subsequent HF hospitalization (HFH) and all-cause mortality. Overall, 61% were male; mean age 76 ± 11 years. De novo patients were more often male (66% vs. 56%) and more likely to have ischaemic heart disease (IHD; 31% vs. 14%) and diabetes (24% vs. 6%), but less likely to have atrial fibrillation (AF; 25% vs. 33%) than replacement patients (all P < 0.01). LVSD was present in 344 (37%) and was more frequent in de novo than replacement cases (20% vs. 17%, P < 0.01). Independent predictors of LVSD were IHD [odds ratio (OR)=2.56, confidence interval (CI): 1.58–4.13] and ventricular pacing burden >80% (OR = 2.13, CI: 1.29–3.52). Over a median 30 (IQR: 16–42) months, 341 (33%) experienced HFH or death, more commonly after replacement than de novo RVP (25% vs. 8%, P < 0.01). Predictors of adverse outcomes included replacement status [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.27, CI: 1.78–4.16], older age, AF, and LVEF
: Copyright of European Heart Journal Open is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index