Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus MEDLINE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Consenting for pelvic nerve injury in colorectal surgery: need to address age and gender bias.

Title: Consenting for pelvic nerve injury in colorectal surgery: need to address age and gender bias.
Authors: Nesargikar PN; Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.; Kaur V; Cocker DM; Lengyel J
Source: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England [Ann R Coll Surg Engl] 2010 Jul; Vol. 92 (5), pp. 391-4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 May 19.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Royal College of Surgeons of England Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7506860 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1478-7083 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00358843 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: London : Royal College of Surgeons of England
MeSH Terms: Prejudice*; Colorectal Surgery/*adverse effects ; Informed Consent/*statistics & numerical data ; Pelvis/*innervation ; Trauma, Nervous System/*etiology; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery ; Colorectal Surgery/ethics ; Informed Consent/standards ; Pelvis/surgery ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology ; Urination Disorders/etiology ; Adult ; Age Distribution ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Bias ; England ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sex Factors
Abstract: Introduction: Pelvic nerve injury is a recognised complication following pelvic dissection in colorectal surgery. It can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction in men and women, which varies from 5-40% depending on the surgery and the underlying pathology. Sexual dysfunction can manifest as erectile dysfunction in men and as dyspareunia and failure to achieve sexual arousal/orgasm in women. The aim of this study was to evaluate consent for these complications prior to surgery.; Patients and Methods: We carried out a retrospective audit on patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery involving pelvic dissection over a 2-year period (June 2006 to June 2008) at University Hospital of North Staffordshire. We reviewed the consent forms and medical records of these patients, specifically looking for documentation of pelvic nerve injury, sexual dysfunction or erectile dysfunction prior to surgery. Only patients who had documented pelvic dissection in their operative notes were included in the audit, and those who were deemed unable to consent were excluded.; Results: Medical records of 118 patients were reviewed. Of this cohort, 31% were women (n = 37). Malignancy was the indication for surgery in 79% of women and 88% of men. Consent for the procedure was obtained by a consultant in 73% (n = 86) of patients and by a middle-grade surgeon in the remaining 27% (n = 32). Only two women were consented for pelvic nerve injury whilst this number was 41 for men (5% vs 51%). Patients younger than 50 years were more consistently informed of the risks (50%) compared to the over 50-year-olds (34%). Only eight patients (males 6, females 2) were consented for urinary dysfunction.; Conclusions: The risk of pelvic nerve injury is not frequently stated, which is more common in women and the elderly. Overall, only 36% of patients were consented for pelvic nerve injury, while only 5% of women were consented. Is this professional discretion, or evidence that surgeons are not being assiduous enough when obtaining consent, which may leave them vulnerable to medicolegal claims? Introduction of procedure-specific consent forms would be a method to address this issue.
References: World J Surg. 1980;4(2):149-52. (PMID: 7190753); Am J Surg. 1987 Nov;154(5):502-4. (PMID: 3674298); Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):212-23. (PMID: 16041212); Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 May;88(3):261-4. (PMID: 16719993); Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Sep;23(9):893-900. (PMID: 18535831); Gut. 2004 Sep;53 Suppl 5:V1-16. (PMID: 15306569); Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):465-8. (PMID: 15048749); Scand J Gastroenterol. 1977;12(2):193-7. (PMID: 847386); ANZ J Surg. 2004 Apr;74(4):248-59. (PMID: 15043737); Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Nov;90(8):643-6. (PMID: 18796191); J R Soc Med. 1988 Sep;81(9):503-8. (PMID: 3184105)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20100522 Date Completed: 20100809 Latest Revision: 20260128
Update Code: 20260130
PubMed Central ID: PMC3180310
DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12628812459779
PMID: 20487592
Database: MEDLINE

Journal Article