Short term global health experiences and local partnership models: a framework.
| Title: | Short term global health experiences and local partnership models: a framework. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Loh LC; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Sixth Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M7, Canada. lawrence.loh@utoronto.ca.; Brooklyn, NY, USA. lawrence.loh@utoronto.ca.; Cherniak W; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Markham-Stouffville Hospital, University of Toronto, 381 Church Street, PO Box 1800, Markham, ON, L3P 7P3, Canada. william@bridgetohealth.ca.; Bridge to Health, 491 Lawrence Avenue West, Suite 301, Toronto, ON, M5M 1C7, Canada. william@bridgetohealth.ca.; Dreifuss BA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 2800 E Ajo Way, Tucson, AZ, 85714, USA. bdreifuss@aemrc.arizona.edu.; Global Emergency Care Collaborative, PO Box 4404, Shrewsbury, MA, 01545, USA. bdreifuss@aemrc.arizona.edu.; Dacso MM; University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, Center for Global Health Education, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA. mmdacso@utmb.edu.; Lin HC; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. linhc@email.chop.edu.; Brooklyn, NY, USA. linhc@email.chop.edu.; Evert J; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue MUE3, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. jevert@cfhi.org.; Child Family Health International, 995 Market Street, Suite 1104, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA. jevert@cfhi.org. |
| Source: | Globalization and health [Global Health] 2015 Dec 18; Vol. 11, pp. 50. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 18. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101245734 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1744-8603 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17448603 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Global Health Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2005- |
| MeSH Terms: | International Educational Exchange* ; Public-Private Sector Partnerships*; Capacity Building/*methods ; Global Health/*education ; Program Development/*methods; Humans |
| Abstract: | Contemporary interest in in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) has led to important questions of ethics, responsibility, and potential harms to receiving communities. In addressing these issues, the role of local engagement through partnerships between external STEGH facilitating organization(s) and internal community organization(s) has been identified as crucial to mitigating potential pitfalls. This perspective piece offers a framework to categorize different models of local engagement in STEGH based on professional experiences and a review of the existing literature. This framework will encourage STEGH stakeholders to consider partnership models in the development and evaluation of new or existing programs.The proposed framework examines the community context in which STEGH may occur, and considers three broad categories: number of visiting external groups conducting STEGH (single/multiple), number of host entities that interact with the STEGH (none/single/multiple), and frequency of STEGH (continuous/intermittent). These factors culminate in a specific model that provides a description of opportunities and challenges presented by each model. Considering different models, single visiting partners, working without a local partner on an intermittent (or even one-time) basis provided the greatest flexibility to the STEGH participants, but represented the least integration locally and subsequently the greatest potential harm for the receiving community. Other models, such as multiple visiting teams continuously working with a single local partner, provided an opportunity for centralization of efforts and local input, but required investment in consensus-building and streamlining of processes across different groups. We conclude that involving host partners in the design, implementation, and evaluation of STEGH requires more effort on the part of visiting STEGH groups and facilitators, but has the greatest potential benefit for meaningful, locally-relevant improvements from STEGH for the receiving community. There are four key themes that underpin the application of the framework: 1. Meaningful impact to host communities requires some form of local engagement and measurement. 2. Single STEGH without local partner engagement is rarely ethically justified. 3. Models should be tailored to the health and resource context in which the STEGH occurs. 4. Sending institutions should employ a model that ultimately benefits local receiving communities first and STEGH participants second. Accounting for these themes in program planning for STEGH will lead to more equitable outcomes for both receiving communities and their sending partners. |
| References: | BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:121. (PMID: 18518997); Acad Med. 2007 Mar;82(3):226-30. (PMID: 17327707); Acad Med. 2011 Jul;86(7):889-91. (PMID: 21494116); Med Educ. 2009 Feb;43(2):121-6. (PMID: 19161481); Lancet. 2009 Jun 6;373(9679):1993-5. (PMID: 19493564); Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):211-4. (PMID: 20682858); Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Dec;83(6):1178-82. (PMID: 21118918); J Glob Health. 2013 Dec;3(2):020406. (PMID: 24363924); Implement Sci. 2012;7:50. (PMID: 22651257); J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jul;18(7):592-4. (PMID: 12848844) |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20151220 Date Completed: 20160623 Latest Revision: 20220318 |
| Update Code: | 20260130 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC4683927 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12992-015-0135-7 |
| PMID: | 26684302 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Journal Article