Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus MEDLINE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Health care utilization following "digi-physical" assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care.

Title: Health care utilization following "digi-physical" assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care.
Authors: Entezarjou A; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.; Sjöbeck M; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.; Midlöv P; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.; Nymberg VM; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.; Vigren L; Capio Go, Gothenburg, Sweden.; Labaf A; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.; Jakobsson U; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.; Calling S; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Source: BMC primary care [BMC Prim Care] 2022 Jan 12; Vol. 23, pp. 4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 12 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9918300889006676 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2731-4553 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 27314553 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Prim Care Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central Ltd., [2022]-
Abstract: Background: The use of chat-based digital visits (eVisits) to assess infectious symptoms in primary care is rapidly increasing. The "digi-physical" model of care uses eVisits as the first line of assessment while assuming a certain proportion of patients will inevitably need to be further assessed through urgent physical examination within 48 h. It is unclear to what extent this approach can mitigate physical visits compared to assessing patients directly using office visits.; Methods: This pre-COVID-19-pandemic observational study followed up "digi-physical" eVisit patients (n = 1188) compared to office visit patients (n = 599) with respiratory or urinary symptoms. Index visits occurred between March 30th 2016 and March 29th 2019. The primary outcome was subsequent physical visits to physicians within two weeks using registry data from Skåne county, Sweden (Region Skånes Vårddatabas, RSVD).; Results: No significant differences in subsequent physical visits within two weeks (excluding the first 48 h) were noted following "digi-physical" care compared to office visits (179 (18.0%) vs. 102 (17.6%), P = .854). As part of the "digital-physical" concept, a significantly larger proportion of eVisit patients had a physical visit within 48 h compared to corresponding office visit patients (191 (16.1%) vs. 19 (3.2%), P 
Competing Interests: Competing interestsAE: currently employed by Capio AB. AL: stock ownership in Doctrin AB. LV: previously employed by Capio AB. Other authors declared no conflicts of interest.
References: Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):639-644. (PMID: 31313978); Telemed J E Health. 2017 Mar;23(3):200-204. (PMID: 27351543); Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):485-491. (PMID: 28264950); Telemed J E Health. 2011 May;17(4):304-8. (PMID: 21457013); J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e35. (PMID: 28213342); Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):312-7. (PMID: 27048524); BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):1193. (PMID: 32738884); BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e036585. (PMID: 32709650); Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 19;:. (PMID: 34278421); Telemed J E Health. 2021 May;27(5):532-536. (PMID: 32522103); Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5):. (PMID: 30962253); Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66. (PMID: 15798043); Telemed J E Health. 2018 Mar;24(3):210-215. (PMID: 28731388); Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Sep;2(3):347-354. (PMID: 29623633); JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 15;9(3):e25473. (PMID: 33720032); Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:134-140. (PMID: 31128825); Disabil Health J. 2020 Oct;13(4):100973. (PMID: 32703737); JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 14;173(1):72-4. (PMID: 23403816); J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar;31(3):269-75. (PMID: 26269131); Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 05;6(9):ofz393. (PMID: 31660415); Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):90-6. (PMID: 25474083); Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2014-2023. (PMID: 30633682); Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):258-64. (PMID: 24493769); JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Sep 3;8(9):e18930. (PMID: 32880578)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Infection; Primary care; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Utilization; eVisits
Molecular Sequence: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03474887
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20220117 Latest Revision: 20240116
Update Code: 20260130
PubMed Central ID: PMC8753946
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2
PMID: 35036998
Database: MEDLINE

Journal Article