Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical nephrectomy for stage I and II renal cell carcinoma.
| Title: | Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical nephrectomy for stage I and II renal cell carcinoma. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dursun F; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Elshabrawy A; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Wang H; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Rodriguez R; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Urologic Oncology, UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7845, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA.; Liss MA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Urologic Oncology, UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7845, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA.; Kaushik D; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Urologic Oncology, UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7845, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA.; Gelfond J; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.; Mansour AM; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. ahmedmansour1st@hotmail.com.; Urologic Oncology, UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7845, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA. ahmedmansour1st@hotmail.com.; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. ahmedmansour1st@hotmail.com. |
| Source: | International journal of clinical oncology [Int J Clin Oncol] 2022 Jun; Vol. 27 (6), pp. 1068-1076. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 23. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Springer-Verlag Tokyo Country of Publication: Japan NLM ID: 9616295 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1437-7772 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13419625 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Clin Oncol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 1998- : Tokyo : Springer-Verlag Tokyo; Original Publication: Tokyo : Published for the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology by Churchill Livingstone, c1996- |
| MeSH Terms: | Carcinoma, Renal Cell*/pathology ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell*/surgery ; Kidney Neoplasms*/pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms*/surgery ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*/pathology ; Laparoscopy*; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrectomy ; Retrospective Studies |
| Abstract: | Background: A recently reported phase III randomized trial comparing open and minimally invasive hysterectomy showed significantly higher rates of local recurrence after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for cervical cancer. This raised concerns regarding patterns of recurrences and survival after MIS in general. This study aims to determine the effect of MIS on all-cause mortality among patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for Stage I and II renal cell carcinoma (RCC).; Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage I-II RCCs between 2010 and 2013. Patients for whom a laparoscopic or robotic radical nephrectomy was attempted were compared to patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy (ORN). Adjusted regression models with inverse probability propensity score weighting (IPW) were utilized to identify independent predictors of receiving MIS. All-cause mortality rates were compared using IPW survival functions and log-rank tests. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to determine independent predictors of OS.; Results: 27,642 patients were identified; 11,524 (41.7%) had MIS, while 16,118 (58.3%) had ORN. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the IPW cohort showed significant OS advantage for patients who underwent MIS (p |
| References: | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE et al (2021) Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 71:7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654. (PMID: 10.3322/caac.2165433433946); DeCastro GJ, McKiernan JM (2008) Epidemiology, clinical staging, and presentation of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 35:581–592. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.07.005); Robson CJ (1963) Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 89:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64494-X. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64494-X13974490); Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37770-4. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37770-41830346); Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Michaelson MD et al (2019) NCCN guidelines insights: kidney cancer, version 2.2020. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 17:1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054. (PMID: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054); Liu G, Ma Y, Wang S et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Oncol 10:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.004285507705447386); Burgess NA, Koo BC, Calvert RC et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic ν open nephrectomy. J Endourol 21:610–613. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0277. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2006.027717638555); Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L et al (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1804923. (PMID: 10.1056/nejmoa1804923303796136464372); Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177:862–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.053. (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.05317296361); Berger A, Brandina R, Atalla MA et al (2009) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: oncological outcomes at 10 years or more. J Urol 182:2172–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.047. (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.04719758651); Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67131-5. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67131-510992356); Luo JH, Zhou FJ, Xie D et al (2010) Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. World J Urol 28:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0487-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-009-0487-919916010); National cancer database. https://www.facs.org/Quality-Programs/Cancer/NCDB . Accessed 15 Dec 2020.; Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015) Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 34:3661–3679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607. (PMID: 10.1002/sim.6607262389584626409); Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Wiley, Hoboken.; Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92:1843–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7%3c1843::AID-CNCR1701%3e3.0.CO;2-W. (PMID: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:73.0.CO;2-W11745257); Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1806395 . Epub 2018 Oct 31. PMID: 30380365. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMOA180639530380365); Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bean S et al (2020) NCCN Guidelines Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18(6):660–666. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0027 . PMID: 32502976. (PMID: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.002732502976); Colombo JR, Haber GP, Jelovsek JE et al (2008) Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 71:1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.081. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.08118313111); Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173917.37265.41. (PMID: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173917.37265.4116145374); Golombos DM, Chughtai B, Trinh QD et al (2017) Minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy in the modern era: does approach matter? World J Urol 35:1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2040-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-017-2040-628477204); Lv L, Hu W, Ren Y et al (2016) Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 9:6751–6762. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S112105. (PMID: 10.2147/OTT.S112105278262015096744); Syn NL, Kabir T, Koh YX et al (2020) Survival advantage of laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials and propensity-score matched studies. Ann Surg 272:253–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003672. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000367232675538); Tan HJ, Hafez KS, Ye Z et al (2012) Postoperative complications and long-term survival among patients treated surgically for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 187(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2011.09.031 . Epub 2011 Nov 23. PMID: 22114816. (PMID: 10.1016/J.JURO.2011.09.03122114816); Ananth AA, Tai L-H, Lansdell C et al (2016) Surgical stress abrogates pre-existing protective t cell mediated anti-tumor immunity leading to postoperative cancer recurrence. PLoS ONE 11:e0155947. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0155947. (PMID: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0155947271960574873120); Abu-Ghanem Y, Zilberman DE, Dotan Z et al (2018) Perioperative blood transfusion adversely affects prognosis after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 36(1):12.e15-12.e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLONC.2017.09.006 . Epub 2017 Oct 6. PMID: 28993059. (PMID: 10.1016/J.UROLONC.2017.09.006); Wu H-L, Tai Y-H, Lin S-P et al (2018) (2018) The impact of blood transfusion on recurrence and mortality following colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis of 4,030 patients. Sci Reports 81(8):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31662-5. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-018-31662-5); Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE (2000) Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 18:2327–2340. (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2327); Dixon PR, Grant RC, Urbach DR (2015) The impact of marketing language on patient preference for robot-assisted surgery. Surg Innov 22:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350614537562. (PMID: 10.1177/155335061453756224902683) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery; Open surgery; Radical Nephrectomy; Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20220323 Date Completed: 20220523 Latest Revision: 20220523 |
| Update Code: | 20260130 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10147-022-02153-5 |
| PMID: | 35319076 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Journal Article