Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus MEDLINE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone or in combination with substrate modulation after electrical cardioversion failure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: The PACIFIC trial: Study design.

Title: Pulmonary vein isolation alone or in combination with substrate modulation after electrical cardioversion failure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: The PACIFIC trial: Study design.
Authors: Bortone AA; Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Privé Les Franciscaines, ELSAN, Nîmes, France.; Marijon E; Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.; Limite LR; Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Privé Les Franciscaines, ELSAN, Nîmes, France.; Lagrange P; Service de Cardiologie, Clinique St Pierre, ELSAN, Perpignan, France.; Brigadeau F; Service de Rythmologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.; Martins R; Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.; Durand C; Service de Rythmologie, Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon, Lyon, France.; Albenque JP; Département de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Corporate Authors: PACIFIC study group
Source: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology [J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol] 2023 Feb; Vol. 34 (2), pp. 270-278. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 07.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Clinical Trial Protocol
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9010756 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1540-8167 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10453873 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: Malden, MA : Blackwell; Original Publication: Mt. Kisco, N.Y. : Futura Pub., c1990-
MeSH Terms: Atrial Fibrillation*/diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation*/surgery ; Pulmonary Veins*/surgery ; Catheter Ablation*/adverse effects ; Catheter Ablation*/methods; Electric Countershock/adverse effects ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome ; Recurrence ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Abstract: Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective at treating 50% of unselected patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Alternatively, PVI combined with a new ablation strategy entitled the Marshall-PLAN ensures a 78% 1-year sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rate in the same population. However, a substantial subset of patients could undergo the Marshall-PLAN unnecessarily. It is therefore essential to identify those patients who can be treated with PVI alone versus those who may truly benefit from the Marshall-PLAN before ablation is performed. In this context, we hypothesized that electrical cardioversion (EC) could help to select the most appropriate strategy for each patient.; Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, randomized study, patients with AF recurrence within 4 weeks after EC will be randomized 1:1 to PVI alone or the Marshall-PLAN. Conversely, patients in whom SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC will be treated with PVI only and included in a prospective registry. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year SR maintenance rate after a single ablation procedure.; Results and Conclusion: The Marshall-PLAN might be necessary in patients with an advanced degree of persistent AF (i.e., where SR is not maintained for ≥4 uninterrupted weeks after EC). Conversely, in patients with mild or moderate persistent AF (i.e., where SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC), PVI alone might be a sufficient ablation strategy. The PACIFIC trial is the first study designed to assess whether rhythm monitoring after EC could help to identify patients who should undergo adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI.; (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: Boveda S, Metzner A, Nguyen DQ, et al. Single-procedure outcomes and quality-of-life improvement 12 months post-cryoballoon ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:1440-1447.; Su WW, Reddy VY, Bhasin K, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the multicenter STOP persistent AF trial. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17:1841-1847.; Huo Y, Gaspar T, Schönbauer R, et al. Low-voltage myocardium-guided ablation trial of persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med Evid. 2022;1:1. doi:10.1056/EVIDoa2200141.; Verma A, Jiang C, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1812-1822.; Inoue K, Hikoso S, Masuda M, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation alone vs. more extensive ablation with defragmentation and linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: the EARNEST-PVI trial. EP Europace. 2021;23:565-574.; Fink T, Schlüter M, Heeger CH, et al. Stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation versus pulmonary vein isolation with additional substrate modification as index ablation procedures in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: the randomized Alster-Lost-AF trial (ablation at St. Georg Hospitalst. georg hospital for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10:e005114.; Pambrun T, Denis A, Duchateau J, et al. MARSHALL bundles elimination, pulmonary veins isolation and lines completion for ANatomical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: MARSHALL-PLAN case series. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:7-15.; Derval N, Duchateau J, Denis A, et al. Marshall bundle elimination, pulmonary vein isolation, and line completion for anatomical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): prospective, single-center study. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:529-537.; Sohns C, Marrouche NF. Atrial fibrillation and cardiac fibrosis. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:1123-1131.; Njoku A, Kannabhiran M, Arora R, et al. Left atrial volume predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation: a meta-analysis. EP Europace. 2018;20:33-42.; Nault I, Lellouche N, Matsuo S, et al. Clinical value of fibrillatory wave amplitude on surface ECG in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;26:11-19.; Thotamgari SR, Sheth AR, Ahmad J, et al. Low left atrial appendage emptying velocity is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33:1705-1711. doi:10.1111/jce.15580.; Haïssaguerre M, Sanders P, Hocini M, et al. Changes in atrial fibrillation cycle length and inducibility during catheter ablation and their relation to outcome. Circulation. 2004;109:3007-3013.; Rivard L, Hocini M, Rostock T, et al. Improved outcome following restoration of sinus rhythm prior to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a comparative multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1025-1030.; Okawa K, Hara S, Morimoto T, et al. Effect of preprocedural pharmacologic cardioversion on pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:1473-1479.; Everett 4th, TH, Li H, Mangrum JM. Electrical, morphological, and ultrastructural remodeling and reverse remodeling in a Canine Model of chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102:1454-1460.; Chalfoun N, Harnick D, Pe E, Undavia M, Mehta D, Gomes JA. Reverse electrical remodeling of the atria post cardioversion in patients who remain in sinus rhythm assessed by signal averaging of the P-wave. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007;30:502-509.; Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) task force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(632):e21-696.e21.; Verma A, Wazni OM, Marrouche NF, et al. Pre-existent left atrial scarring in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:285-292.; Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, et al. Tailored atrial substrate modification based on low-voltage areas in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:825-833.; Kottkamp H, Berg J, Bender R, Rieger A, Schreiber D. Box Isolation of Fibrotic Areas (BIFA): a patient-tailored substrate modification approach for ablation of atrial fibrillation: substrate modification BIFA in AF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:22-30.; Huo Y, Gaspar T, Pohl M, et al. Prevalence and predictors of low voltage zones in the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation. EP Europace. 2018;20:956-962.; Valderrábano M, Chen HR, Sidhu J, Rao L, Ling Y, Khoury DS. Retrograde ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall: regional left atrial ablation, vagal denervation and feasibility in humans. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009;2:50-56.; Valderrábano M, Peterson LE, Bunge R, et al. Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for persistent atrial fibrillation: VENUS and MARS clinical trial design. Am Heart J. 2019;215:52-61.; Pambrun T, Derval N, Duchateau J, et al. Epicardial course of the musculature related to the great cardiac vein: anatomical considerations and clinical implications for mitral isthmus block after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:1951-1958.; Pambrun T, Duchateau J, Delgove A, et al. Epicardial course of the septopulmonary bundle: anatomical considerations and clinical implications for roof line completion. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:349-357.; Shah D, Haïssaguerre M, Takahashi A, Jaïs P, Hocini M, Clémenty J. Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line. Circulation. 2000;102:1517-1522.; Jaïs P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation. 2008;118:2498-2505.; Pappone C, Augello G, Sala S, et al. A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2340-2347.; Wazni OM, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005;293:2634-2640.; Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303:333-340.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Marshall-PLAN; atrial fibrillation; comparative study; electrical cardioversion; pulmonary vein isolation; randomized study
Molecular Sequence: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05264831
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221126 Date Completed: 20230210 Latest Revision: 20260105
Update Code: 20260130
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15761
PMID: 36434797
Database: MEDLINE

Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Clinical Trial Protocol