Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus MEDLINE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Parent perspectives on the benefits and risks of child-livestock interactions.

Title: Parent perspectives on the benefits and risks of child-livestock interactions.
Authors: Klataske RT; Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.; Durbin TJ; Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.; Barnes KL; National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.; Koshalek K; National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.; Bendixsen CG; National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.
Source: Frontiers in public health [Front Public Health] 2023 Jan 27; Vol. 11, pp. 1050584. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 27 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Frontiers Editorial Office Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101616579 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2296-2565 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 22962565 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Front Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Lausanne : Frontiers Editorial Office
MeSH Terms: Livestock* ; Family Relations*; Animals ; Cattle ; United States ; Agriculture ; Risk Assessment
Abstract: Growing up on a farm or ranch often involves interactions with livestock that present both potential risks and benefits to children. While these "child-livestock interactions" contribute to the burden of agriculturally related injuries to youth in the United States, they may also result in improved immunological health and other benefits. Agricultural upbringings are also widely perceived to improve physical, cognitive, and skill development of children, contributing to a combination of potential benefits and risks known as the "farm kid paradox." Although previous studies show the health impacts of child-livestock interactions, less is known about the ways in which farm and ranch parents perceive the benefits and risks of these interactions, and how and why they choose to raise children around livestock. Our research addresses this gap by analyzing data from semi-structured interviews with 30 parents of children between the ages of 10-18 who produce beef cattle in Kansas. This research is part of a larger anthropological study of the benefits and risks of child-livestock interactions involving parents on beef and dairy operations in multiple states, along with agricultural safety and health professionals. The results offer insights into the experiences, practices, and perspectives of parents, outlining agricultural ways of life in which safety and relations to risk are shaped by patterns of production, family dynamics, values and habits, and other social and cultural dimensions. These insights deepen our understanding of parents' perceptions of both benefits and risks of agricultural childhoods.; (Copyright © 2023 Klataske, Durbin, Barnes, Koshalek and Bendixsen.)
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References: Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Apr 1;7(2):e000040. (PMID: 32148701); J Agromedicine. 2019 Apr;24(2):157-166. (PMID: 30668265); J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Dec;146(6):1379-1386.e6. (PMID: 32650021); Nat Rev Immunol. 2010 Dec;10(12):861-8. (PMID: 21060319); Lancet. 2001 Oct 6;358(9288):1129-33. (PMID: 11597666); Fam Pract. 2022 Jul 19;39(4):785-789. (PMID: 34849754); J Agric Saf Health. 2011 Apr;17(2):127-46. (PMID: 21675283); Clin Exp Allergy. 2000 Feb;30(2):187-93. (PMID: 10651770); J Agromedicine. 2017;22(1):17-25. (PMID: 27749196); J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;141(1):454-456.e4. (PMID: 28870458); J Agromedicine. 2011 Jul-Sep;16(3):174-93. (PMID: 21728869); J Agromedicine. 2023 Jan;28(1):61-68. (PMID: 36384459); BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 16;12(1):423. (PMID: 31311588); Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan;97(1):133-43. (PMID: 17138920); N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):411-421. (PMID: 27518660); J Agromedicine. 2017;22(1):56-65. (PMID: 27782783); J Agromedicine. 2017;22(1):26-35. (PMID: 27749156); N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 24;364(8):701-9. (PMID: 21345099); J Anthropol N Am. 2019 Fall;22(2):139-142. (PMID: 32685908); J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):298-303. (PMID: 28762886); Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep;32(3):603-11. (PMID: 18448493); BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):126. (PMID: 30700262); J Prim Prev. 2010 Apr;31(1-2):69-83. (PMID: 20140646); J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):407-12, 412.e1-4. (PMID: 18678343); AIDS Educ Prev. 2006 Aug;18(4 Suppl A):59-73. (PMID: 16987089)
Grant Information: U54 OH009568 United States OH NIOSH CDC HHS
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: agriculture; anthropology; children; health; livestock; risk; safety; youth
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20230213 Date Completed: 20230214 Latest Revision: 20260313
Update Code: 20260313
PubMed Central ID: PMC9911528
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1050584
PMID: 36778552
Database: MEDLINE

Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.