Revision/Conversion Surgeries After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-An Experts' Modified Delphi Consensus.
| Title: | Revision/Conversion Surgeries After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-An Experts' Modified Delphi Consensus. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kermansaravi M; Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mkermansaravi@yahoo.com.; Chiappetta S; Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy. drschiappetta@gmail.com.; Parmar C; Whittington Hospital, London, UK.; Carbajo MA; Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.; Musella M; Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.; Chevallier JM; Université Paris 5, Paris, France.; Ribeiro R; Centro Multidisciplinar Do Tratamento da Obesidade, Hospital Lusíadas Amadora e Lisboa, Amadora, Portugal.; Ramos AC; Gastro-Obeso-Center, Institute for Metabolic Optimization, Sao Paulo, Brazil.; Weiner R; Bariatric Surgery Unit, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.; Nimeri A; Department of Surgery, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.; Aarts E; WeightWorks Clinics and Allurion Clinics, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.; Abbas SI; Iranian Hospital, Alwasl Road, Dubai, UAE.; Bashir A; Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC)-Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan.; Behrens E; New Life Center, Guatemala, Guatemala.; Billy H; Ventura Advanced Surgical Associates, Ventura, CA, USA.; Cohen RV; Center for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Oswaldo Cruz German Hospital, Sao Paolo, Brazil.; Caina D; Dr. Federico Abete Hospital for Trauma and Emergency, Obesity and Metabolic Center, Malvinas, Argentina.; De Luca M; Department of General Surgery, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.; Dillemans B; Department of General Surgery, AZ Sint Jan Brugge-Oostende, Brugge, Belgium.; Fobi MAL; Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics Surgery Center, Indore, India.; Neto MG; Mohak Bariatric and Robotic Center, Indore, India.; Gawdat K; Bariatric Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.; ElFawal MH; Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.; Kasama K; Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery Center, Yotsuya Medical Cube, Tokyo, Japan.; Kassir R; Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Félix Guyon, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France.; Khan A; Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, UK.; Kow L; Adelaide Bariatric Centre, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.; Kular KDS; Founding President MGB-OAGB Club, Kular Research Institute, Bija, India.; Lakdawala M; Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, India.; Layani L; Al Sharq Hospital, Fujairah, UAE.; Lee WJ; Medical Weight Loss Center, China Medical University Shinchu Hospital, Zhubei, Taiwan.; Luque-de-León E; The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico.; Mahawar K; South Tyneside and Sunderland Foundation NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK.; Almomani H; NMC Royal Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.; Miller K; Diakonissen Wehrle Private Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.; González JCO; Obesity Surgeons Mexico, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico.; Prasad A; Apollo Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India.; Rheinwalt K; Department of Bariatric, Metabolic, and Plastic Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Cologne, Germany.; Rutledge R; Center for Laparoscopic Obesity Surgery, Las Vegas, NV, USA.; Safadi B; Aman Hospital, Doha, Qatar.; Salminen P; Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Department of Digestive Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.; Shabbir A; National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.; Taskin HE; Department of Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.; Verboonen JS; Obesity Goodbye Center, Tijuana, Mexico.; Vilallonga R; Endocrine, Bariatric, and Metabolic Surgery Department, University Hospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.; Wang C; Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.; Shikora SA; Department of Surgery, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.; Prager G; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. |
| Source: | Obesity surgery [Obes Surg] 2024 Jul; Vol. 34 (7), pp. 2399-2410. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 11. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Springer Science + Business Media Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9106714 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1708-0428 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09608923 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Obes Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 2006- : New York : Springer Science + Business Media; Original Publication: Oxford, OX, UK : Rapid Communications of Oxford, [1991- |
| MeSH Terms: | Gastric Bypass*/adverse effects ; Obesity, Morbid*/surgery ; Delphi Technique* ; Reoperation* ; Consensus*; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Humans ; Weight Loss ; Female ; Male ; Weight Gain |
| Abstract: | Purpose: There is a lack of evidence for treatment of some conditions including complication management, suboptimal initial weight loss, recurrent weight gain, or worsening of a significant obesity complication after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). This study was designed to respond to the existing lack of agreement and to provide a valuable resource for clinicians by employing an expert-modified Delphi consensus method.; Methods: Forty-eight recognized bariatric surgeons from 28 countries participated in the modified Delphi consensus to vote on 64 statements in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was regarded to indicate a consensus.; Results: A consensus was achieved for 46 statements. For recurrent weight gain or worsening of a significant obesity complication after OAGB, more than 85% of experts reached a consensus that elongation of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is an acceptable option and the total bowel length measurement is mandatory during BPL elongation to preserve at least 300-400 cm of common channel limb length to avoid nutritional deficiencies. Also, more than 85% of experts reached a consensus on conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with or without pouch downsizing as an acceptable option for the treatment of persistent bile reflux after OAGB and recommend detecting and repairing any size of hiatal hernia during conversion to RYGB.; Conclusion: While the experts reached a consensus on several aspects regarding revision/conversion surgeries after OAGB, there are still lingering areas of disagreement. This highlights the importance of conducting further studies in the future to address these unresolved issues.; (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
| References: | Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus conference statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34. (PMID: 32152841); De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206. (PMID: 29600339); ASMBS Endorsed Procedures and FDA Approved Devices. 2022. [cited 2024 January 11]; Available from: https://asmbs.org/resources/endorsed-procedures-and-devices .; Kermansaravi M, Parmar C, Chiappetta S, et al. Patient selection in one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass-an expert modified Delphi consensus. Obes Surg. 2022;32(8):2512–24. (PMID: 35704259); Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P. Bariatric surgery survey 2018: similarities and disparities among the 5 IFSO chapters. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):1937–48. (PMID: 334324837800839); Parmar CD, Gan J, Stier C, et al. One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): a systematic review of 1075 patients. Int J Surg (London, England). 2020;81:32–8.; Kermansaravi M, Shahmiri SS, DavarpanahJazi AH, et al. One anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) as revisional surgery following primary restrictive bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):370–83. (PMID: 33118133); Ponce de Leon-Ballesteros G, Pouwels S, Romero-Velez G, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Bhandari M, Brown W, Copaescu C, De Luca M, Fobi M, Ghanem OM, Hasenberg T, Herrera MF, Herrera-Kok JH, Himpens J, Kow L, Kroh M, Kurian M, Musella M, Narwaria M, Noel P, Pantoja JP, Ponce J, Prager G, Ramos A, Ribeiro R, Ruiz-Ucar E, Salminen P, Shikora S, Small P, Stier C, Taha S, Taskin EH, Torres A, Vaz C, Vilallonga R, Verboonen S, Zerrweck C, Zundel N, Parmar C. Metabolic and bariatric surgery in patients with obesity class V (BMI > 60kg/m2): a modified delphi study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(3):790–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06990-9 .; Hussain A, Van den Bossche M, Kerrigan DD, et al. Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group. Int J Surg (London, England). 2019;69:13–8.; De Luca M, Piatto G, Merola G, et al. IFSO update position statement on one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3251–78. (PMID: 33939059); Chiappetta S, Weiner R. Evidence of the mini-/one-anastomosis-gastric-bypass for being a standard procedure in obesity and metabolic surgery. Chirurg. 2018;89(8):589–96. (PMID: 29931379); Kermansaravi M, DavarpanahJazi AH, ShahabiShahmiri S, et al. Areas of non-consensus around one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB): a narrative review. Obes Surg. 2021;31(6):2453–63. (PMID: 33598845); Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12. (PMID: 29243145); Mahawar KK, Omar I, Singhal R, et al. The first modified Delphi consensus statement on sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(12):7027–33. (PMID: 33433676); Kermansaravi M, Parmar C, Chiappetta S, et al. Best practice approach for redo-surgeries after sleeve gastrectomy, an expert’s modified Delphi consensus. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(3):1617–28. (PMID: 36693918); Keleidari B, Dehkordi MM, Shahraki MS, et al. Bile reflux after one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery: a review study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;64:102248. (PMID: 33868682); Salminen P, Kow L, Aminian A, et al. IFSO consensus on definitions and clinical practice guidelines for obesity management-an international Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(1):30–42. (PMID: 37999891); El Ansari W, Elhag W. Weight regain and insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: definitions, prevalence, mechanisms, predictors, prevention and management strategies, and knowledge gaps-a scoping review. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1755–66. (PMID: 335554518012333); Gero D, Vannijvel M, Okkema S, et al. Defining global benchmarks in elective secondary bariatric surgery comprising conversional, revisional, and reversal procedures. Ann Surg. 2021;274(5):821–8. (PMID: 34334637); Elhag W, El Ansari W. Effectiveness and safety of liraglutide in managing inadequate weight loss and weight regain after primary and revisional bariatric surgery: anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes. Obes Surg. 2022;32(4):1005–15. (PMID: 35060021); Jensen AB, Renström F, Aczél S, et al. Efficacy of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists liraglutide and semaglutide for the treatment of weight regain after bariatric surgery: a retrospective observational study. Obes Surg. 2023;33(4):1017–25. (PMID: 367650199918402); Yan W, Bai R, Yan M, et al. Preoperative fasting plasma C-peptide levels as predictors of remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 2017;30(6):383–93. (PMID: 28045566); Chen Y, Zeng G, Tan J, et al. Impact of roux-en Y gastric bypass surgery on prognostic factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis and systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(7):653–62. (PMID: 25387821); Ferro S, Zulian V, De Palma M, Sartori A, Andreica A, Nedelcu M, Carandina S. Resizing of the gastric pouch for weight regain after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass: is it a valid option? J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6238. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216238 .; Phisitkul P, Akoh CC, Rungprai C, et al. Optimizing arthroscopy for osteochondral lesions of the talus: the effect of ankle positions and distraction during anterior and posterior arthroscopy in a Cadaveric Model. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(12):2238–45. (PMID: 28807507); Faul A, Chevallier JM, Poghosyan T. Dilated gastric pouch resizing for weight loss failure after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3406–9. (PMID: 31115846); Abu Dayyeh BK, Lautz DB, Thompson CC. Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(3):228–33. (PMID: 21092760); Patel LY, Lapin B, Brown CS, et al. Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(6):2667–77. (PMID: 27752820); Salman MA, Salman A, Assal MM, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb (BPL) versus a 200-cm BPL, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1846–56. (PMID: 3702260910234867); Slagter N, de Heide LJM, Jutte EH, et al. Tailoring limb length based on total small bowel length in one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery (TAILOR study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):526. (PMID: 357331989214974); Eagleston J, Nimeri A. Optimal small bowel limb lengths of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Curr Obes Rep. 2023;12(3):345–54. (PMID: 37466789); Soong TC, Almalki OM, Lee WJ, et al. Measuring the small bowel length may decrease the incidence of malnutrition after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with tailored bypass limb. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(10):1712–8. (PMID: 31558409); Kassir R, Giudicelli X, Lointier P, Breton C, Blanc P. Omega loop gastroileal bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) versus one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): medium-term results. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1597–602. (PMID: 33409980); De Luca M, Himpens J, Angrisani L, et al. A new concept in bariatric surgery. Single anastomosis gastro-ileal (SAGI): Technical details and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):143–7. (PMID: 27431665); Musella M, Vitiello A, Susa A, et al. Revisional surgery after one anastomosis/minigastric bypass: an Italian multi-institutional survey. Obes Surg. 2022;32(2):256–65. (PMID: 349731238795019); Cazzo E, Jimenez LS, Valerini FG. Weight loss and vomiting 1 year after banded versus non-banded one anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1719–25. (PMID: 31942688); Cazzo E, Valerini FG, Chaim FHM. Early weight loss outcomes and glucose metabolism parameters after banded versus non-banded one anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Arq Gastroenterol. 2019;56(1):15–21. (PMID: 31141062); Parmar C, Pouwels S. Oesophageal and gastric cancer after bariatric surgery: an up-to-date systematic scoping review of literature of 324 cases. Obes Surg. 2022;32(12):3854–62. (PMID: 36241765); Davarpanah Jazi AH, Shahabi S, Sheikhbahaei E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on GERD after OAGB: rate, treatments, and success. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;17(12):1321–32. (PMID: 38148703); Kassir R, Petrucciani N, Debs T. Conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for biliary reflux resistant to medical treatment: lessons learned from a retrospective series of 2780 consecutive patients undergoing OAGB. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2093–8. (PMID: 32052289); Kermansaravi M, Abbas A, Pishgahroudsari M, et al. Short-term outcomes of the conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in symptomatic reflux patients without revising the size of the gastric pouch. J Minim Access Surg. 2021;17(3):318–21. (PMID: 32964872); Rheinwalt KP, Schipper S, Plamper A, et al. Roux-en-Y versus one anastomosis gastric bypass as redo-operations following sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective study. World J Surg. 2022;46(4):855–64. (PMID: 34985543); Verras GI, Mulita F, Pouwels S, Parmar C, Drakos N, Bouchagier K, Kaplanis C, Skroubis G. Outcomes at 10-year follow-up after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion, and sleeve gastrectomy. J Clin Med. 2023;12(15):4973. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154973 .; Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (Mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67. (PMID: 29995293); Almerie MQ, Darrien JH, Javed S, et al. Braun procedure is effective in treating bile reflux following one anastomosis gastric bypass: a case series. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3880–2. (PMID: 33928523); Werapitiya SB, Ruwanpura SP, Coulson TR. Laparoscopic fundoplication using the excluded stomach as a novel management option for refractory bile reflux following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Obes Surg. 2022;32(2):561–6. (PMID: 34817792); Ospanov O, Yeleuov G, Buchwald JN, et al. A randomized controlled trial of acid and bile reflux esophagitis prevention by modified fundoplication of the excluded stomach in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year results of the FundoRing trial. Obes Surg. 2023;33(7):1974–83. (PMID: 37099252); Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England). 2019;393(10178):1299–309. (PMID: 30851879); Stier C, Parmar C, Koschker A-C, Bokhari M, Stier R, Chiappetta S. Computed tomography-3D-volumetry: a valuable adjunctive diagnostic tool after bariatric surgery. Minim Invasive Surg. 2020;4:18. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.75 .; Sakran N, Haj B, Pouwels S, et al. Standardization of the one-anastomosis gastric bypass procedure for morbid obesity: technical aspects and early outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Techn. 2023;33(2):162–70.; Deitel M. Essentials of mini-one anastomosis gastric bypass. Springer; 2018.; Poljo A, Pentsch A, Raab S, et al. Incidence of dumping syndrome after sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass. J Metab Bariatric Surg. 2021;10(1):23–31.; Robert M, Poghosyan T, Maucort-Boulch D, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years (YOMEGA): a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised extension study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12(4):267–76. (PMID: 38452784); Charalampos T, Maria N, Vrakopoulou VGZ, et al. Tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year outcomes of 94 patients. Obes Surg. 2019;29(2):542–51. (PMID: 30430382); Rheinwalt KP, Plamper A, Rückbeil MV, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-a mid-term cohort study with 612 patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1230–40. (PMID: 31758474); Zarshenas N, Tapsell LC, Batterham M, et al. Changes in anthropometric measures, nutritional indices and gastrointestinal symptoms following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) compared with Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB). Obes Surg. 2021;31(6):2619–31. (PMID: 336242107901677); Andrade L, Chiote I, Santos-Cruz A, et al. Protein intake, adherence to vitamin-mineral supplementation, and dumping syndrome in patients undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3557–64. (PMID: 33880746); Vargas EJ, Abu Dayyeh BK, Storm AC, et al. Endoscopic management of dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a large international series and proposed management strategy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(1):91–6. (PMID: 32112780) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Conversion; Correction; OAGB; Reversal; Revision; Revisional bariatric surgery |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20240611 Date Completed: 20240701 Latest Revision: 20260423 |
| Update Code: | 20260423 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-024-07345-8 |
| PMID: | 38862752 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Journal Article