Wet Lab Protocols Matter: Choice of DNA Extraction and Library Preparation Protocols Bias Ancient Oral Microbiome Recovery.
| Title: | Wet Lab Protocols Matter: Choice of DNA Extraction and Library Preparation Protocols Bias Ancient Oral Microbiome Recovery. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wright SL; Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; One Health Microbiome Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.; Center for Health Through Microbiomes, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Abdul-Aziz M; Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, and Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.; Blaha GN; Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; Ta CK; Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; One Health Microbiome Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; Gancz A; Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; One Health Microbiome Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; Ademola-Popoola IJ; Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; One Health Microbiome Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; Szécsényi-Nagy A; ELTE Research Centre for the Humanities, Institute of Archaeogenomics, MTA-BTK Lendület 'Momentum' Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.; Sereno PC; Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.; Institut de Recherches en Sciences Humains, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, Niamey, Niger République.; Weyrich LS; Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; One Health Microbiome Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, and Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. |
| Source: | Molecular ecology resources [Mol Ecol Resour] 2025 Nov; Vol. 25 (8), pp. e70054. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Oct 06. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101465604 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1755-0998 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1755098X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Mol Ecol Resour Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: Oxford, England : Blackwell |
| MeSH Terms: | DNA, Ancient*/isolation & purification ; Microbiota*/genetics ; Dental Calculus*/microbiology ; Metagenomics*/methods ; Mouth*/microbiology ; DNA, Bacterial*/isolation & purification ; DNA, Bacterial*/genetics ; Specimen Handling*/methods ; Gene Library*; Archaeology/methods ; Humans |
| Abstract: | Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis of archaeological dental calculus has provided a wealth of insights into ancient health, demography and lifestyles. However, the workflow for ancient metagenomics is still evolving, raising concerns about reproducibility. Few systematic investigations have examined how DNA extraction methods and library preparation protocols influence ancient oral microbiome recovery, despite evidence from modern populations suggesting that they do. This leaves a gap in our understanding of how wet-lab protocols impact aDNA recovery from dental calculus. In this study, we apply two DNA extraction and two library preparation methods in the aDNA field on dental calculus samples from Hungary and Niger. Samples from each context have similar chronological ages, but differences in their levels of aDNA preservation are notable, providing additional insights into how the efficacy of wet-lab protocols is impacted by sample preservation. Several metrics were employed to assess intra- and inter-sample variability, such as DNA fragment length recovery, GC content, clonality, endogenous content, DNA deamination and microbial composition. Our findings indicate that both DNA extraction and library preparation protocols can considerably impact ancient DNA recovery from archaeological dental calculus. Furthermore, no single protocol consistently outperformed the others across all assessments, and the effectiveness of specific protocol combinations depended on the preservation of the sample. These findings highlight the challenges of meta-analyses and underscore the need to account for technical variability. Lastly, our study raises the question of whether the field should strive to standardise methods for comparability or optimise protocols based on sample preservation and specific research objectives.; (© 2025 The Author(s). Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| References: | Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 22;13(1):6927. (PMID: 36414613); J Hered. 2021 May 24;112(3):241-249. (PMID: 33768239); PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Nov 16;17(11):e1009442. (PMID: 34784344); F1000Res. 2024 May 28;12:926. (PMID: 39262445); Pharmacol Res. 2013 Mar;69(1):137-43. (PMID: 23201354); Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0009022. (PMID: 35289669); Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 24;110(39):15758-63. (PMID: 24019490); Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16321. (PMID: 30397210); BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 12;9:88. (PMID: 26868221); Int J Legal Med. 2024 Sep;138(5):1891-1905. (PMID: 38594499); Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 10;118(32):. (PMID: 34312252); Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 19;370(1660):20130376. (PMID: 25487328); Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Mar;16(2):459-69. (PMID: 26401836); Biotechniques. 2014 Jun 01;56(6):289-90, 292-6, 298, passim. (PMID: 24924389); PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jun 21;12(6):e1004957. (PMID: 27327495); Gigascience. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):. (PMID: 32657325); Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jun 2;45(10):e79. (PMID: 28119419); Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Jul;10(4):677-83. (PMID: 21565072); mSystems. 2021 Dec 21;6(6):e0131521. (PMID: 34931883); Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):14024-9. (PMID: 26512100); Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010 Jun;2010(6):pdb.prot5448. (PMID: 20516186); Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):1531. (PMID: 30728424); mSystems. 2019 Feb 12;4(1):. (PMID: 30801021); Nature. 2015 Jun 11;522(7555):207-11. (PMID: 25731166); Biotechniques. 2007 Mar;42(3):343-52. (PMID: 17390541); Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Nov;17(6):1183-1201. (PMID: 28199781); PeerJ. 2019 Mar 13;7:e6594. (PMID: 30886779); Microbiome. 2018 Dec 17;6(1):226. (PMID: 30558668); Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 24;15(1):10191. (PMID: 39582065); Nature. 2017 Apr 20;544(7650):357-361. (PMID: 28273061); Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;41(2):151-157. (PMID: 29305057); PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34131. (PMID: 22479540); Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(1):e3. (PMID: 22021376); Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 Aug;22(6):2130-2147. (PMID: 34549888); NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021 Nov 18;7(1):81. (PMID: 34795298); PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169877. (PMID: 28099455); J Dent Res. 2018 May;97(5):547-555. (PMID: 29394879); J Hum Evol. 2015 Feb;79:119-24. (PMID: 25476244); Biotechniques. 2015 Dec 01;59(6):368-71. (PMID: 26651516); Sci Data. 2021 Jan 26;8(1):31. (PMID: 33500403); Nat Protoc. 2013 Apr;8(4):737-48. (PMID: 23493070); Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):450-5, 455e1. (PMID: 23416520); Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 13;5:16498. (PMID: 26563586); Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 23;375(1812):20190578. (PMID: 33012223); Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 01;29(13):1682-4. (PMID: 23613487); Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024 Feb;22(2):89-104. (PMID: 37700024); Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 29;8(1):9822. (PMID: 29959351); Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Feb;171(2):275-284. (PMID: 31785113); PLoS One. 2013 Jul 03;8(7):e67699. (PMID: 23844068); PLoS One. 2008 Aug 14;3(8):e2995. (PMID: 18701936); Nat Methods. 2011 Jul 17;8(9):761-3. (PMID: 21765408); Nat Genet. 2014 Apr;46(4):336-44. (PMID: 24562188); Microbiome. 2021 Sep 30;9(1):197. (PMID: 34593021); BMC Microbiol. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):227. (PMID: 30591021); Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(6):1939-43. (PMID: 2928314); Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 2;11(1):7456. (PMID: 33811235); J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5002-17. (PMID: 20656903); PeerJ. 2024 Mar 1;12:e16770. (PMID: 38440408); Nat Commun. 2013;4:1764. (PMID: 23612305); Anal Biochem. 2021 Jun 15;623:114193. (PMID: 33831350); Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2327:93-118. (PMID: 34410642); Microbiome. 2021 Apr 29;9(1):95. (PMID: 33910647); Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Jul;21(7):426-440. (PMID: 33510490); Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 11;104(37):14616-21. (PMID: 17715061); Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20):. (PMID: 33972424); Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Aug 30;82(18):5519-29. (PMID: 27371581); Nature. 2015 Jun 11;522(7555):167-72. (PMID: 26062507); Nat Microbiol. 2023 Dec;8(12):2315-2325. (PMID: 38030898); Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7792):665-670. (PMID: 31969706); Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Oct;105(5 Pt 2):508-22. (PMID: 9395117); Trends Microbiol. 2017 May;25(5):362-374. (PMID: 28089325) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: ancient DNA; dental calculus; laboratory methods; metagenomics; oral microbiome |
| Substance Nomenclature: | 0 (DNA, Ancient); 0 (DNA, Bacterial) |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251006 Date Completed: 20251024 Latest Revision: 20251027 |
| Update Code: | 20260130 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC12550470 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1755-0998.70054 |
| PMID: | 41048034 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Journal Article