Evaluation of ChatGPT-5-generated clinical management recommendations for HPV infection and cervical premalignant lesions: a scenario-based expert assessment study.
| Title: | Evaluation of ChatGPT-5-generated clinical management recommendations for HPV infection and cervical premalignant lesions: a scenario-based expert assessment study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Gokkaya M; Department of Gynecological Oncology, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, 27070, Turkey. mugokkaya@gmail.com.; Yalcin N; Department of Gynecological Oncology, Batman Training and Research Hospital, Batman, Turkey.; Alci A; Department of Gynecological Oncology, Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.; Taşkum İ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey. |
| Source: | BMC medical informatics and decision making [BMC Med Inform Decis Mak] 2026 Apr 18. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Apr 18. |
| Publication Model: | Ahead of Print |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088682 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6947 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726947 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001- |
| Competing Interests: | Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Gaziantep City Hospital on 17 September 2025 (decision no. 314/2025). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Responses generated by ChatGPT-5 were included as supplementary material without modification and contained no personal or identifiable data. The authors declare no commercial or financial relationship with OpenAI. The entire evaluation process was conducted independently and exclusively for scientific research purposes. All expert physicians who participated in the evaluation process were informed of the study’s purpose and design, and their participation was entirely voluntary. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. |
| References: | Karuppan Perumal MK, Renuka R, Kumar Subbiah R, S., Natarajan M, P. Artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support systems for early detection and precision therapy in oral cancer: a mini review. Front oral health. 2025;6:1592428.; Reicher L, Lutsker G, Michaan N, Grisaru D, Laskov I. Exploring the role of artificial intelligence, large language models: Comparing patient-focused information and clinical decision support capabilities to the gynecologic oncology guidelines. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025;168(2):419–27.; Fan J, Xiao W, Yan Z, Ouyang Q. Accuracy of AI chatbots in answering frequently asked questions on cervical cancer. Front Artif Intell. 2025;8:1655303.; Ito Y, Miyoshi A, Ueda Y, Tanaka Y, Nakae R, Morimoto A, Shiomi M, Enomoto T, Sekine M, Sasagawa T, Yoshino K, Harada H, Nakamura T, Murata T, Hiramatsu K, Saito J, Yagi J, Tanaka Y, Kimura T. An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system improves the accuracy of image diagnosis of uterine cervical lesions. Mol Clin Oncol. 2022;16(2):27.; Wagholikar KB, MacLaughlin KL, Henry MR, Greenes RA, Hankey RA, Liu H, Chaudhry R. Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening. J Am Med Inf Association: JAMIA. 2012;19(5):833–9.; Paiboonborirak C, Abu-Rustum NR, Wilailak S. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025;171(1Suppl 1):199–209.; Hou X, Shen G, Zhou L, Li Y, Wang T, Ma X. Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:851367.; Andreassen AK, Mortensen E, Stenbro R, Sørensen Ø, Sørbye SW. Digital Pathology with AI for Cervical Biopsies: Diagnostic Accuracy at the CIN2 + Threshold. Cancers. 2025;17(23):3808.; Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216–9.; Chung S, Giuffrè M, Rajashekar N, Pu Y, Shin YE, Kresevic S, Chan C, Nakamura-Sakai S, You K, Saarinen T, Hsiao A, Wong AH, Evans L, McCall T, Kizilcec RF, Sekhon J, Laine L, Shung DL. Usability and adoption in a randomized trial of GutGPT a GenAI tool for gastrointestinal bleeding. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8(1):527.; Ghasemi A, Hashtarkhani S, Schwartz DL, Shaban-Nejad A. Explainable artificial intelligence in breast cancer detection and risk prediction: a systematic scoping review. Cancer Innov. 2024;3(5):e136.; Anastasio MK, Peters P, Foote J, Melamed A, Modesitt SC, Musa F, Rossi E, Albright BB, Havrilesky LJ, Moss HA. The doc versus the bot: A pilot study to assess the quality and accuracy of physician and chatbot responses to clinical questions in gynecologic oncology. Gynecologic Oncol Rep. 2024;55:101477.; Hung YC, Chaker SC, Sigel M, Saad M, Slater ED. Comparison of Patient Education Materials Generated by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Versus Experts: An Innovative Way to Increase Readability of Patient Education Materials. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;91(4):409–12.; Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, Leas EC, Zhu Z, Kelley JB, Faix DJ, Goodman AM, Longhurst CA, Hogarth M, Smith DM. Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(6):589–96.; Waisberg E, Ong J, Masalkhi M, Zaman N, Sarker P, Lee AG, Tavakkoli A. Google’s AI chatbot Bard: a side-by-side comparison with ChatGPT and its utilization in ophthalmology. Eye. 2024;38(4):642–5.; Hancı V, Ergün B, Gül Ş, Uzun Ö, Erdemir İ, Hancı FB. Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of ChatGPT®, BARD®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity® responses on palliative care. Medicine, 2024;103(33):e39305.; Nagy M, Sisk B. How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect Patient-Clinician Relationships? AMA J ethics. 2020;22(5):E395–400.; Inglada Galiana L, Gudino C, L., Miramontes González P. Ethics and artificial intelligence. Rev Clin Esp. 2024;224(3):178–86.; Massie PL, Arshad SA, Auyang ED. Readability of American Society of Metabolic Surgery’s Patient Information Publications. J Surg Res. 2024;293:727–32.; Trutner ZD, Furlough K, Martinez A, Vetter I, Uhler LM, Haynes A, Jayakumar P. Is Health Literacy Associated With Surgical Outcomes? A Systematic Review. J Surg Res. 2023;291:720–33. |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Cervical premalignant lesions; ChatGPT-5; HPV infection |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260418 Latest Revision: 20260418 |
| Update Code: | 20260419 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12911-026-03459-4 |
| PMID: | 42001041 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Journal Article