Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus MEDLINE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Gaps Between Guidelines and Practice in Patients with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study (SNAPSHOT-Brazil Study).

Title: Gaps Between Guidelines and Practice in Patients with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study (SNAPSHOT-Brazil Study).
Authors: Colombo FMC; Hypertension Unit, Heart Institute of Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-900, Brazil.; Précoma DB; Sociedade Hospitalar Angelina Caron, Campina Grande do Sul 83430-000, Brazil.; Camazzola FE; Instituto de Pesquisas em Saúde (IPS), Fundação Universidade de Caxias do Sul (FUCS), Caxias do Sul 95070-561, Brazil.; Abib Junior E; Scentryphar Pesquisa Clínica, Campinas 13026-501, Brazil.; Franco DR; CPclin-Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas, São Paulo 01228-200, Brazil.; Magalhães LBNC; Faculdade Zarns, Salvador 41741-590, Brazil.; de Souza Spinelli AC; Cardiocentro Natal, Natal 59020-300, Brazil.; Gemelli JR; Clínica Gemelli, Brasília 76804-094, Brazil.; Borges JLC; Centro de Pesquisa Clínica do Brasil, Brasília 71625-009, Brazil.; Montenegro Junior RM; Walter Cantidio University Hospital, Federal University of Ceará/Ebserh, Fortaleza 60110-110, Brazil.; Dourado PMM; Pró Coração Cardiologia Preventiva, São Paulo 05021-010, Brazil.; do Nascimento Lima RV; Medical Affairs Department, Servier Brazil Laboratories, Rio de Janeiro 22641-700, Brazil.; da Silva ML; Medical Affairs Department, Servier Brazil Laboratories, Rio de Janeiro 22641-700, Brazil.; Gewehr DM; Postgraduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil.; Nogueira A; Postgraduate Program in Cardiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Brazil.; de Freitas Pereira ET; Medical Affairs Department, Servier Brazil Laboratories, Rio de Janeiro 22641-700, Brazil.; Lima Junior E; Postgraduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil.
Source: Journal of clinical medicine [J Clin Med] 2026 Apr 15; Vol. 15 (8). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Apr 15.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: MDPI AG Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101606588 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2077-0383 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20770383 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Clin Med Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Basel, Switzerland : MDPI AG, [2012]-
Abstract: Background/Objectives: The guideline targets for blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are frequently unmet, and physicians often misjudge control. This study aimed to characterize the real-world control of BP, HbA1c, and LDL-C in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension, herein called cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM), and to compare guideline-based versus physician-perceived disease control. Methods: We conducted SNAPSHOT-Brazil, a nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study to gather real-world data on patients with CMM. The ESC guidelines defined the cardiovascular (CV) risk and control targets. Results: We included 451 patients with hypertension and T2D (median age 65 years; 60% female; 54% White). Most patients (98%) were on pharmacotherapy and reported high adherence (according to the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale). A very high CV risk predominated (78%); 22% of the patients were at a high risk. The guideline-defined control was achieved in 27% for BP, 34% for HbA1c, 13% for LDL-C, and 6% for both BP and LDL-C; only 3% met all three targets simultaneously. The physicians accurately stratified the CV risk in 49% of patients, while 50% had their CV risk underestimated. They systematically overestimated control in 29% of cases for BP, 35% for LDL-C, and 25% for both. The sensitivity ranged from 0.88 to 0.98; the positive predictive values ranged from 0.19 to 0.48, and the positive likelihood ratios ranged from 2.16 to 3.65. Conclusions: The SNAPSHOT-Brazil study revealed a low attainment of BP, HbA1c, and LDL-C targets, despite the widespread pharmacotherapy and the high self-reported adherence. The physicians consistently overestimated disease control and underestimated the CV risk.
Grant Information: 0 Servier Brazil Laboratories
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: LDL; LDL-C control; cholesterol; diabetes mellitus; essential hypertension; glycemic control; hypertension control; medication adherence; physician perception; risk assessment
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260504 Date Completed: 20260504 Latest Revision: 20260507
Update Code: 20260507
PubMed Central ID: PMC13117057
DOI: 10.3390/jcm15083022
PMID: 42074821
Database: MEDLINE

Journal Article