The Open Versus Closed Access Publication Advantage in Orthopaedic Surgery.
| Title: | The Open Versus Closed Access Publication Advantage in Orthopaedic Surgery. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kothari SK; From the Drexel University College of Medicine (Kothari, Shamith, Ilyas), Philadelphia, PA, the Rothman Orthopaedic Institute (Nemirov, Ilyas), and Drexel University (Neshal K. Kothari), Philadelphia, PA.; Nemirov D; Shamith S; Kothari NK; Ilyas AM |
| Source: | The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [J Am Acad Orthop Surg] 2026 May 13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 May 13. |
| Publication Model: | Ahead of Print |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9417468 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1940-5480 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1067151X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 2016- : Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer; Original Publication: Rosemont, IL : American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, c1993- |
| Abstract: | Background: As scientific publishing has shifted to digital platforms, two primary article-publishing modalities have emerged: open access and closed access. Open access is freely accessible with an article processing charge (APC) paid by authors, whereas closed access lies behind paywalls, with low to no APC for authors. As the academic community increasingly relies on digital dissemination, it is critical to evaluate how these models influence research visibility and impact. This study compared open versus closed access randomized control trials (RCTs) across five prevalent orthopaedic conditions by analyzing attention scores, social media metrics, readership, and citations. The study hypothesis was that open access publications would have higher attention and readership, whereas closed access articles would yield more citations.; Methods: A PubMed search was conducted in May 2025 to identify RCTs on rotator cuff tears, carpal tunnel syndrome, hip fractures, anterior cruciate ligament tears, and Achilles tendon ruptures. Altmetric Attention Scores, X mentions, Facebook mentions, news mentions, Mendeley readers, and Dimensions citations were collected for each article using the Altmetric Explorer database. A negative binomial regression, adjusted for time since publication, was used to compare metrics between open and closed access publications.; Results: Of 1,223 articles studied, 53.8% of the articles were open access and 46.2% were closed access. Open access articles had significantly higher Altmetric Attention Scores (44.1 ± 197 vs 17.2 ± 52.0), X mentions (32.2 ± 27.1 vs 17.4 ± 38.4), Facebook mentions (1.2 ± 4.3 vs 1 ± 2.5), news mentions (4.1 ± 25.2 vs 1.0 ± 7.2), number of Mendeley readers (136.6 ± 127.9 vs 113.4 ± 108), and, notably, number of Dimensions citations (36.8 ± 88.9 vs 30.1 ± 45.6) compared with closed access articles ( P < 0.05).; Conclusion: Contrary to our initial hypothesis, open access articles had higher attention metrics and citation numbers when compared with closed access publications. These findings suggest that open access publishing not only enhances visibility and engagement but also may increase academic impact across multiple orthopaedic subspecialties.; (Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.) |
| References: | Cox J, Cox L: Scholarly Publishing Practice: Third Survey. West Sussex, UK: The Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers 2008.; Khan N, Deacy D, Healy D: Examining the transition from print to electronic journals through the lens of sustainability. Surgeon: J R Colleges Surg Edinb Ireland 2024;22:209-211.; Austin RE: Online vs print publication: The case for online publication. Aesthet Surg J 2021;41:1104-1105.; Carroll MW: Why full open access matters. Plos Biol 2011;9:e1001210.; Clark AD, Myers TC, Steury TD, et al.: Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology. PeerJ 2024;12:e16824.; Zhang L, Wei Y, Huang Y, Sivertsen G: Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research. Scientometrics 2022;127:7653-7679.; Tau N, Moutel M, Petithomme-Nanrocki M, Hentzien M, Yahav D: Impact of Open Access status on journal metrics in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology - A cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Now 2024;54:104909.; Gray T, Harris AB, Patel R, Oni J, Aiyer A: Open access publication in total ankle arthroplasty literature is associated with increased social media attention, but not increased citations. Foot Ankle Orthop 2024;9:24730114241247817.; Cueto R, Harris AB, Root K, Sabharwal S, Raad M, Oni JK: Open access publication in total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased social media attention, but is not associated with increased citations. J Arthroplasty 2024;39:285-289.; Vadhera AS, Lee JS, Veloso IL, et al.: Open access articles garner increased social media attention and citation rates compared with subscription access research articles: An altmetrics-based analysis. The Am J Sports Med 2022;50:3690-3697.; Zhang D, Blazar P, Kilgallen EE, Earp BE: Impact of conventional and open access publications in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021;29:e1239-e1245.; Altmetric: Donut and altmetric attention Score, Available at: https://www.altmetric.com/about-us/our-data/donut-and-altmetric-attention-score/ , Accessed January 18, 2025.; Mohammadi E, Thelwall M, Kousha K: Can mendeley Bookmarks Reflect Readership? A Survey of user motivations. J Assoc Inf Sci Technology 2015;67:1198-1209.; Support A: Dimensions Citation Data. Available at: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000236718-dimensions-citation-data . Accessed January 18, 2025.; Tulandi T, Shehata FF, Decherney A: Fertility and sterility and impact factor. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2105-2106.; Özkent Y: Social media usage to share information in communication journals: An analysis of social media activity and article citations. PLoS One 2022;17:e0263725.; Thoma B, Murray H, Huang SYM, et al.: The impact of social media promotion with infographics and podcasts on research dissemination and readership. Cjem 2018;20:300-306.; Siler K, Haustein S, Smith E, Larivière V, Alperin JP: Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: The case of global health research. PeerJ 2018;6:e4269.; Fares MY, Vadhera AS, Daher M, et al.: The 100 Most impactful articles on total shoulder arthroplasty: An altmetric analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 2024;16:441-447.; Buchanan TR, Cueto RJ, Foreman M, Harris AB, Root KT, Oni JK: Can you pay your way to readership? Free to publish open access formats receive greater readership and citations than paid open access formats in total knee arthroplasty literature. J Arthroplasty 2024;39:1444-1449.; Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Patel MR, et al.: How does open access publication impact readership and citation rates of Lumbar Spine Literature?. Clin Spine Surg 2022;35:E558-e565. |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260514 Latest Revision: 20260515 |
| Update Code: | 20260515 |
| DOI: | 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00915 |
| PMID: | 42133992 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Journal Article