| Title: |
When Paranoia Makes Sense. |
| Authors: |
Kramer, Roderick M.1 |
| Source: |
Harvard Business Review. Jul2002, Vol. 80 Issue 7, p62-69. 8p. 2 Color Photographs. |
| Subject Terms: |
*WORK environment; *EMPLOYEE attitudes; *ORGANIZATIONAL sociology; *INTERORGANIZATIONAL relations; *COMPETITIVE advantage in business; *CORPORATE culture; *SOCIOLOGY of work; *OFFICE politics; *ORGANIZATIONAL effectiveness; *ATTITUDES toward work; TRUST; SUSPICION; EMOTIONAL intelligence; BELIEF & doubt |
| Abstract: |
On September 11, 2001, in the space of a few horrific minutes, Americans realized the fragility of trust. The country's evident vulnerability to deadly terrorism rocked our faith in the systems we rely on for security. Our trust was shaken again only a few months later with the stunning collapse of Enron, forcing us to question many of the methods and assumptions underpinning the way we work. These two crises are obviously very different, yet both serve as reminders of the perils of trusting too much. The abiding belief that trust is a strength now seems dangerously naive. This new doubtfulness runs contrary to most management literature, which has traditionally touted trust as an organizational asset. It's an easy case to make. When there are high levels of trust, employees can fully commit themselves to the organization because they can be confident that their efforts will be recognized and rewarded. Trust also means that leaders don't have to worry so much about putting the right spin on things. They can act and speak forthrightly and focus on essentials. In short, trust is an organizational superglue. Nevertheless, two decades of research on trust and cooperation in organizations have convinced social psychologist Roderick Kramer that--despite its costs--distrust can be beneficial in the workplace. Kramer has observed that a moderate form of suspicion, which he calls prudent paranoia, can in many cases prove highly beneficial to the distrustful individual or organization. In this article, he describes situations in which prudent paranoia makes sense and shows how, when properly deployed, it can serve as a powerful morale booster--even a competitive weapon--for organizations. INSETS: Keeping Paranoia Prudent;Paranoia@Work. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| : |
Copyright © Harvard Business Publishing. All Rights Reserved. This content is intended for individual research use only, subject to the following: Unless permission is expressly granted in a separate license, this content may NOT be used for classroom or teaching use, which includes teaching materials, electronic reserves, course packs or persistent linking from syllabi. Please consult your institution's librarian about the nature of relevant licenses held by your institution and the restrictions that may or may not apply.Unless permission is expressly granted in a separate license, this content may NOT be used in corporate training and/or as corporate learning materials. For corporate users, please consult the specific terms of your company's license(s) for complete information and restrictions. For more information and teaching resources from Harvard Business Publishing including Harvard Business School Cases, eLearning products, and business simulations please visit hbsp.harvard.edu. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Business Source Premier |