Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Who Gets What in Education: Can School Matching Improve Student Achievement? Working Paper 34936

Title: Who Gets What in Education: Can School Matching Improve Student Achievement? Working Paper 34936
Language: English
Authors: Atila Abdulkadiroglu; Parag A. Pathak; Christopher R. Walters; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Source: National Bureau of Economic Research. 2026.
Availability: National Bureau of Economic Research. 1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138-5398. Tel: 617-588-0343; Web site: http://www.nber.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools; Secondary Education
Descriptors: Urban Schools; Educational Change; School Organization; School Closing; Academic Achievement; High Schools; Resource Allocation; School Choice; Admission (School); Educational Policy; Educational Resources
Geographic Terms: New York (New York)
Abstract: We examine two approaches to improving urban school systems: changing who gets to go to existing schools (reallocation) and restructuring school portfolios through closures and reconstitution (resource augmentation). Using data from New York City high schools, we estimate models of school effects allowing for both vertical school quality differences and horizontal student-specific match effects. While sophisticated reallocation policies that optimize student-school matches can generate modest educational gains, they are constrained by limited seats at highly effective schools. Simple resource-augmentation policies targeting replacement of low-performing schools achieve comparable improvements with less systemic disruption. Analysis of NYC's school closures reveals that basic graduation rate metrics effectively identify struggling schools, suggesting complex value-added models may be unnecessary for targeting closure decisions. Our findings indicate that capacity constraints, rather than poor school matching, primarily drive educational inequality.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Access URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w34936
Accession Number: ED679664
Database: ERIC