Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Measuring Boundary-Spanning Behaviors in Community Engagement

Title: Measuring Boundary-Spanning Behaviors in Community Engagement
Language: English
Authors: Sandmann, Lorilee R.; Jordan, Jenny W.; Mull, Casey D.; Valentine, Thomas
Source: Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 2014 18(3):83-104.
Availability: Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education. Treanor House, 1234 South Lumpkin Street, Athens, GA 30602. Tel: 706-542-6167; Fax: 706-542-6124; e-mail: jheoe@uga.edu; Web site: http://www.jheoe.uga.edu
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 2014
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Descriptors: Outreach Programs; Change Agents; Community Involvement; Employee Attitudes; Age Differences; Gender Differences; Racial Differences; Status; Context Effect; Performance Factors; Individual Characteristics; Test Construction; Models; Construct Validity; Item Banks; Test Items; Predictor Variables; Item Analysis; Likert Scales; Pilot Projects; Data Analysis; Test Reliability; Test Validity; Partnerships in Education; Behavior Rating Scales; Measurement Techniques
Geographic Terms: Georgia
ISSN: 1534-6102
Abstract: Community engagement professionals and partners serve as, work with, study, and build the capacity of boundary spanners. To augment knowledge about these functions, the Weerts-Sandmann Boundary Spanning Conceptual Framework (2010) has been operationalized through a survey instrument to examine community engagement boundary-spanning behaviors by campus-based actors--leaders, faculty, staff, and students--as well as by community-based spanners in different contexts. This article provides an explication of the underlying theoretical constructs and the development and testing process of the instrument, along with applications for multiple audiences. Implications are presented concerning contextual issues of boundary spanning and generalization of boundary-spanning roles across a variety of potential subjects.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 17
Entry Date: 2014
Accession Number: EJ1043297
Database: ERIC