Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Critical Thinking Assessment of Students in Nonmajors Biology Classes with Corn or Fly Genetics Laboratory Studies

Title: Critical Thinking Assessment of Students in Nonmajors Biology Classes with Corn or Fly Genetics Laboratory Studies
Language: English
Authors: Reinbold, Stephen L.
Source: Journal of College Science Teaching. Nov 2018 48(2):68-75.
Availability: National Science Teachers Association. 1840 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201-3000. Tel: 800-722-6782; Fax: 703-243-3924; e-mail: membership@nsta.org; Web site: http://www.nsta.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 8
Publication Date: 2018
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Critical Thinking; Science Instruction; Biology; Genetics; Nonmajors; Science Laboratories; Plants (Botany); Animals; College Science; College Students; Student Research
ISSN: 0047-231X
Abstract: A critical thinking assessment was used to compare biology students in a nonmajors course who participated in either a multisemester research program or in a one-semester lab study. Initially, it was thought the former would be more effective in promoting critical thinking improvement than the latter. Data from nine biology classes with pre- and posttests were used. Six sections participated in a multisemester fly genetics study, and three sections did a one-semester corn genetics study. Each student wrote a draft and a final report. In the former study, biology students studied Drosophila eye color mutants and wild type that were crossed through parental, F[subscript 1], and F[subscript 2] generations. In the latter study, parental, F[subscript 1], and F[subscript 2] ears of corn were examined. The students in the corn laboratory group actually did better on the posttest. Reasons for this result and other comparisons suggesting the value of a short, multiple-choice assessments are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 17
Entry Date: 2018
Access URL: https://www.nsta.org/publications/browse_journals.aspx?action=issue&id=116134
Accession Number: EJ1195663
Database: ERIC