Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Improving Writing Quality of Capstone Reports

Title: Improving Writing Quality of Capstone Reports
Language: English
Authors: Berry, Frederick C. (ORCID 0000-0003-3608-8668); Phillips, Margaret L. (ORCID 0000-0003-4511-8355); Condron, James; Sanger, Phillip A. (ORCID 0000-0001-5916-7671)
Source: IEEE Transactions on Education. Nov 2021 64(4):383-389.
Availability: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Tel: 732-981-0060; Web site: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=13
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 7
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Writing Improvement; Capstone Experiences; Student Projects; Engineering Education; College Students; Writing Instruction; Educational Technology; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique); Feedback (Response)
DOI: 10.1109/TE.2021.3059739
ISSN: 0018-9359
Abstract: Contributions: The main contribution is to share a series of practical methods that improve the writing quality of capstone reports. Background: The ability to write well is critical to the success of an engineering technology graduate. However, the evidence points to the fact that industries are disappointed with the quality of writing skills graduates demonstrate. Intended Outcomes: A faculty review of capstone reports showed little improvement in writing quality from the first course to the second in a two-semester capstone sequence. Therefore, the instructors explored what actions were needed to improve the writing quality of the capstone reports. Application Design: Several changes in the capstone courses were developed and implemented. The changes included: 1) using instructional technology as a scaffolding to help frame the writing required for the course and 2) engaging students in iterative writing with feedback. Findings: The assessment data showed a significant improvement, at the 5% level. The iterative process of writing and rewriting the report, coupled with frequent meetings with faculty mentors, proved to be a powerful combination for improving the writing process of the students.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1314525
Database: ERIC