Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Learning Analytics in Physics Education: Equity-Focused Decision-Making Lacks Guidance!

Title: Learning Analytics in Physics Education: Equity-Focused Decision-Making Lacks Guidance!
Language: English
Authors: Grimm, Adrian (ORCID 0000-0003-2701-3349); Steegh, Anneke (ORCID 0000-0002-0988-5031); Kubsch, Marcus (ORCID 0000-0001-5497-8336); Neumann, Knut (ORCID 0000-0002-4391-7308)
Source: Journal of Learning Analytics. 2023 10(1):71-84.
Availability: Society for Learning Analytics Research. 121 Pointe Marsan, Beaumont, AB T4X 0A2, Canada. Tel: +61-429-920-838; e-mail: info@solaresearch.org; Web site: https://learning-analytics.info/index.php/JLA/index
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Descriptors: Physics; Science Instruction; Learning Analytics; Equal Education; Guidelines; Vignettes; Theory Practice Relationship; Evaluation Criteria; Standards; Diversity; Ethics; Learning Trajectories; Educational History; Gender Differences; Foreign Countries; Race; Social Class; Intersectionality; Bias
Geographic Terms: Germany
ISSN: 1929-7750
Abstract: Learning Analytics are an academic field with promising usage scenarios for many educational domains. At the same time, learning analytics come with threats such as the amplification of historically grown inequalities. A range of general guidelines for more equity-focused learning analytics have been proposed but fail to provide sufficiently clear guidance for practitioners. With this paper, we attempt to address this theory-practice gap through domain-specific (physics education) refinement of the general guidelines We propose a process as a starting point for this domain-specific refinement that can be applied to other domains as well. Our point of departure is a domain-specific analysis of historically grown inequalities in order to identify the most relevant diversity categories and evaluation criteria. Through two focal points for normative decision-making, namely equity and bias, we analyze two edge cases and highlight where domain-specific refinement of general guidance is necessary. Our synthesis reveals a necessity to work towards domain-specific standards and regulations for bias analyses and to develop counter-measures against (intersectional) discrimination. Ultimately, this should lead to a stronger equity-focused practice in future.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1387188
Database: ERIC