| Title: |
Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) into a Culturally Responsive Evaluation (CRE) Approach to Conduct Mixed-Method Evaluations of Diabetes Prevention and Management Programs Reaching Underresourced Populations and Communities |
| Language: |
English |
| Authors: |
Sara R. Jacobs; LaShawn Glasgow; Peter Amico; Kimberly D. Farris (ORCID 0000-0002-5279-6704); Gia Rutledge; Bryce D. Smith |
| Source: |
Prevention Science. 2024 25(1):46-55. |
| Availability: |
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: |
Y |
| Page Count: |
10 |
| Publication Date: |
2024 |
| Sponsoring Agency: |
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (DHHS/CDC), Division of Diabetes Translation (DDT) |
| Contract Number: |
2002014612630010; 2002014612630009 |
| Document Type: |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: |
Diabetes; Prevention; Evidence Based Practice; Self Management; Disease Control; Program Evaluation; Low Income Groups; Cultural Relevance; Program Implementation; Intervention |
| DOI: |
10.1007/s11121-023-01509-1 |
| ISSN: |
1389-4986; 1573-6695 |
| Abstract: |
Diabetes is a significant population health threat. Evidence-based interventions, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Diabetes Prevention Program and diabetes self-management education and support programs, can help prevent, delay, or manage the disease. However, participation is suboptimal, especially among populations who are at an increased risk of developing diabetes. Evaluations of programs reaching populations who are medically underserved or people with lower incomes can help elucidate how best to tailor evidence-based interventions, but it is also important for evaluations to account for cultural and contextual factors. Culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) is a framework for centering an evaluation in the culture of the programs being evaluated. We integrated CRE with implementation and outcome constructs from the Adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to ensure that the evaluation produced useful evidence for putting evidence-based diabetes interventions to use in real-world settings, reaching populations who are at an increased risk of developing diabetes. The paper provides an overview of how we integrated CRE and CFIR approaches to conduct mixed-methods evaluations of evidence-based diabetes interventions. |
| Abstractor: |
As Provided |
| Entry Date: |
2024 |
| Accession Number: |
EJ1427200 |
| Database: |
ERIC |