Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

How Do We Know What They Know? A Case Study of Classroom-Based Assessment with Multilingual Learners

Title: How Do We Know What They Know? A Case Study of Classroom-Based Assessment with Multilingual Learners
Language: English
Authors: Colleen Fitzpatrick (ORCID 0000-0002-0625-7144); Stephanie van Hover; Vonna Hemmler; Ariel Cornett
Source: Theory and Research in Social Education. 2024 52(4):497-531.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 35
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research; Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: High Schools; Secondary Education; Grade 11
Descriptors: High School Students; High School Teachers; United States History; Local History; Grade 11; Multilingualism; English (Second Language); Performance Based Assessment; Multiple Choice Tests; Testing Problems; Test Validity; Vocabulary Development; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique); Teacher Effectiveness
Geographic Terms: Virginia
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2024.2335236
ISSN: 0093-3104; 2163-1654
Abstract: We employed qualitative research methods to examine student learning in context during a teacher's unit on 1920s-Great Depression in an 11th grade United States & Virginia History class in a standards-based setting with a high-stakes end-of-course test. We focused on four focal students (all of whom were classified as English learners at some point during their education) and collected extensive data to investigate whether these students learned and how they experienced and described their learning from regular classroom instruction. Despite receiving the same instruction, student learning, as measured by the summative assessment, differed greatly, and it was unclear if students learned the historical content. Teaching to the test (e.g., lecture-focused, didactic, narrow fact-focused instruction) did not yield improved results on the multiple-choice test. These findings problematize the use of multiple-choice testing, emphasize the need for explicit academic vocabulary scaffolds for multilingual learners, and highlight the importance of formative assessment. We argue that the conception of teacher as curricular-instructional gate-keeper needs to be expanded to curricular-instructional-assessment gate-keeper.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1451574
Database: ERIC