| Title: |
What Approaches Described in Research Literature Enhance the Engagement of Children and Young People with Severe or Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities? A Systematic Literature Review |
| Language: |
English |
| Authors: |
Dominic Fitzpatrick (ORCID 0009-0000-8290-2275); Richard Parker |
| Source: |
British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2025 53(1):61-73. |
| Availability: |
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: |
Y |
| Page Count: |
13 |
| Publication Date: |
2025 |
| Document Type: |
Journal Articles; Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: |
Literature Reviews; Learning Disabilities; Severe Intellectual Disability; Multiple Disabilities; Children; Youth; Attention; Child Behavior; Social Emotional Learning; Mental Health; Educational Environment |
| DOI: |
10.1111/bld.12619 |
| ISSN: |
1354-4187; 1468-3156 |
| Abstract: |
Background: Children and young people (CYP) with severe or profound and multiple learning disabilities are more likely to experience difficulties engaging for long periods. Finding ways to facilitate their engagement is crucial in promoting their social and emotional development and their mental well-being, particularly as they are more vulnerable to difficulties with mental well-being compared to their peers. Methods: We undertook a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify approaches described within peer-reviewed research literature that enhance the engagement of these children. Data from seven relevant studies were qualitatively synthesised. Thematic networks were then developed to visually present global, organising and basic themes identified within data. Findings: A global theme derived from organising themes across studies indicated that the quality of space is an important consideration in enhancing engagement. This included the extent to which space adhered to prescribed knowledge or afforded practitioners with opportunities to follow their intuition and deviate from such ideas. Conclusions: Quality of space may be important to the engagement of these CYP and consequently to their mental well-being. This may involve consideration of the extent to which formal learning environments for them are organised and informed by dominant theory and discourse (abstract space), prescribed (spatial) practice and the extent to which environments provide conditions for 'lived spaces' that are potentially more facilitative of their engagement and so their mental well-being. |
| Abstractor: |
As Provided |
| Entry Date: |
2025 |
| Accession Number: |
EJ1460585 |
| Database: |
ERIC |