Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes?

Title: Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes?
Language: English
Authors: Christian T. Doabler (ORCID 0000-0002-8074-4311); Megan Rojo; Jenna A. Gersib (ORCID 0000-0002-1270-1889); Anna-Maria Fall; Maria A. Longhi; Gail E. Lovette; Greg Roberts; Jasmine Uy (ORCID 0009-0009-9058-0240); Katharina Johnson; Shadi Ghafghazi; Jason B. Phelps; Sarah R. Powell; William J. Therrien
Source: Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2025 58(2):128-143.
Availability: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2025
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: 1720958
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Early Childhood Education; Elementary Education; Grade 2; Primary Education
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities; Mathematics Skills; Reading Skills; At Risk Students; Learning Disabilities; Science Achievement; Grade 2; STEM Education; Science Instruction; Direct Instruction; Vocabulary Development; Elementary Education
Geographic Terms: Texas
DOI: 10.1177/00222194241263646
ISSN: 0022-2194; 1538-4780
Abstract: Establishing validated science programs for students with or at risk for learning disabilities requires testing treatment effects and exploring differential response patterns. This study explored whether students' initial mathematics and reading skills influenced their treatment response to a whole-class, second-grade science program called Scientific Explorers (Sci2). The original Sci2 study employed a cluster randomized controlled design and included 294 U.S. students from 18 second-grade classrooms. Differential effects of the program by initial mathematics and reading skill levels were not observed for an interactive science assessment and a distal science outcome measure. However, based on initial reading skill levels, moderation results were found on a science vocabulary measure, suggesting the effects of Sci2 were greatest for students with higher initial reading skills. Similar results were found using initial mathematics skill levels as a predictor of differential response such that students with higher mathematics skills reaped stronger treatment effects on the vocabulary measure. Further, we found initial mathematics skills also influenced outcomes on the proximal science content assessment, where students with higher initial mathematics skills led to higher outcomes. Overall, findings suggest Sci2 produced robust effects for all students (g = 0.24-1.23), regardless of initial skill proficiencies. Implications for exploring differential response in science intervention research are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1469760
Database: ERIC