| Abstract: |
This study evaluates the financing and policy architecture of low-threshold clubs for children and youth in the Czech Republic--informal educational spaces that provide preventive, developmental, and integrative services to vulnerable populations. Specifically, the study examines: (a) national-level funding flows and expenditures across five major providers; (b) local operational realities in a case study of Ústí nad Labem; and (c) the European Commission's policy stance on social infrastructure co-financing. The analysis draws on a semi-synthetic dataset constructed from public financial reports, ministry allocations, and interpolated values based on provider averages. Descriptive statistics and a simple linear regression model (Adj. R[superscript 2 = 0.971) demonstrate that approximately 91.2% of total funding is linearly translated into operational expenditures. Additionally, the Social Return on Investment (SROI) framework is applied to map the broader impact of these centres, including volunteer contributions and community outcomes, using a theory-of-change logic model. Results show a heavy reliance on EU operational programmes--particularly OP VVV, which covers an estimated 74% of total funding--with national and local sources unable to compensate for its absence. The fragmented governance across ministries (Education, Social Affairs, Interior, Health) further impedes coordinated data collection and long-term planning. These findings underscore the need for integrated, multi-ministerial policy frameworks, sustained funding cycles, and formal recognition of volunteer and informal educational contributions. The study provides a replicable model for assessing cost-effectiveness and long-term value in youth social services at both national and European levels. |