Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students' Writing Outcomes

Title: Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students' Writing Outcomes
Language: English
Authors: Joshua Wilson (ORCID 0000-0002-7192-3510); Corey Palermo (ORCID 0000-0003-1921-5127); Matthew C. Myers; Tania Cruz Cordero; Halley Eacker; Andrew Potter; Jessica Coles; Henry May (ORCID 0000-0002-5965-3933); Fan Zhang (ORCID 0000-0001-6201-9143)
Source: American Educational Research Journal. 2026 63(1):72-108.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 37
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Junior High Schools; Middle Schools; Secondary Education; Elementary Education; Grade 7; Grade 8
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation; Middle School Students; Outcomes of Education; Writing Achievement; Automation; Underserved Students; Writing Improvement; Self Efficacy; Student Attitudes; Beliefs; School Districts; Teacher Attitudes; Grade 7; Grade 8; English Instruction; Language Arts; English Teachers; Writing Instruction; Technology Uses in Education; Educational Technology; Feedback (Response); Revision (Written Composition)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312251388655
ISSN: 0002-8312; 1935-1011
Abstract: This study used a randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of the automated writing evaluation system MI Write on middle school students from traditionally underserved groups, including Black and Hispanic/Latinx students and those experiencing poverty. The research focused on whether students who used MI Write for one school year (n = 1,260) showed improved argumentative writing performance, increased self-efficacy, greater enjoyment of writing, and stronger beliefs in the recursive nature of writing compared with those who did not use MI Write (n = 1,227). No significant overall treatment effects were found, but significant treatment by district interactions emerged. Perceptions of MI Write were positive overall but varied by district. Findings reveal the limitations and promise of automated writing evaluation.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1494618
Database: ERIC