Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Children's and Adolescents' Reasoning about Distributive Fairness and Educational Inequalities

Title: Children's and Adolescents' Reasoning about Distributive Fairness and Educational Inequalities
Language: English
Authors: Jeanine Grütter (ORCID 0000-0002-3010-3217); Carmen Barth; Iren Karki; Riley N. Sims; Melanie Killen
Source: International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2026 50(2):240-252.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education; Grade 5; Intermediate Grades; Middle Schools; Grade 6; Grade 7; Junior High Schools; Secondary Education; Grade 8; Grade 9; High Schools; Grade 10
Descriptors: Children; Adolescents; Rural Areas; Social Justice; Social Class; Educational Resources; Resource Allocation; Equal Education; Beliefs; Foreign Countries; Student Experience; Grade 5; Grade 6; Grade 7; Grade 8; Grade 9; Grade 10; Socioeconomic Status
Geographic Terms: Nepal
DOI: 10.1177/01650254241308503
ISSN: 0165-0254; 1464-0651
Abstract: To investigate children's and adolescents' reasoning about distributive fairness in a rural area of Nepal, we asked participants (53% girls, N = 706, M[subscript age] = 13.48; SD[subscript age] = 1.79) to distribute educational resources to schools that varied by social class (SC) and to justify their allocation. Most participants allocated equally or equitably; only a minority rewarded the higher-SC school with extra resources. Novel results revealed multiple forms of reasoning coexisting in children's and adolescents' explanations about distributive fairness; participants' reasoning did not just mirror their numeric allocation. Those who allocated equally were primarily concerned with nondiscrimination, whereby some participants focused on social equality and emphasized removing structural barriers. Furthermore, participants' allocation and reasoning depended on their SC and positive experiences at school.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1499940
Database: ERIC