Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

The Family Quality of Life Survey-2006: An Examination of Relationships between Objective and Subjective Data

Title: The Family Quality of Life Survey-2006: An Examination of Relationships between Objective and Subjective Data
Language: English
Authors: Sarah E. Bjornson; C. Lindsay Fitzsimmons; Barry Isaacs; Adrienne Perry
Source: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 2026 51(1):74-82.
Availability: Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Descriptors: Quality of Life; Intellectual Disability; Developmental Disabilities; Surveys; Family Life; Parents; Caregivers; Foreign Countries; Health; Family Income; Services; Family Needs
Geographic Terms: Canada (Toronto)
DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2025.2535873
ISSN: 1366-8250; 1469-9532
Abstract: Background: Family quality of life (FQOL) includes objective and subjective factors representing wellbeing for families of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The current project investigated the integration of objective and subjective data using the Family Quality of Life Survey -- 2006 (FQOLS-2006). Method: 169 parents/caregivers of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities participated. Relationships were examined between objective information from the A Sections of the Health, Finances, and Support from Services domains of the FQOLS-2006, and more subjective FQOL ratings in the B Sections. Results: We found strong relationships between the objective and subjective sections of the FQOLS-2006. Respondents reporting challenges in the A Sections generally reported lower Attainment/Satisfaction ratings in the B sections. However, some responses were discrepant. Conclusion: Objective and subjective measurements of FQOL were consistent but independent. Each type of measurement provided unique information and FQOL is best understood through the integration of these methods.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1505396
Database: ERIC