Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus ERIC kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication: Effect of an Educational Package for Public Health Nurses

Title: Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication: Effect of an Educational Package for Public Health Nurses
Language: English
Authors: Davis, Terry C.; Fredrickson, Doren D.; Kennen, Estela M.; Humiston, Sharon G.; Arnold, Connie L.; Quinlin, Mackey S.; Bocchini, Joseph A.
Source: Health Education & Behavior. 2006 33(6):787-801.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2006
Document Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Nurses; Immunization Programs; Public Health; Clinics; Health Promotion; Professional Training; Health Materials; Comparative Analysis; Symptoms (Individual Disorders); Patients; Risk; Interpersonal Communication; Infants; Check Lists; Racial Differences; Parent Attitudes; Urban Areas; Parent Education
Geographic Terms: Kansas; Louisiana
DOI: 10.1177/1090198106288996
ISSN: 1090-1981
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-service for public health nurses (PHNs) and accompanying educational materials could improve vaccine risk/benefit communication. The content and timing of vaccine communication were recorded during 246 pre-and 217 post-intervention visits in two public health immunization clinics. Pre-/postintervention comparisons showed PHN communication of severe side effects (13% vs. 44%, p less than 0.0001) and their management (29% vs. 60%, p less than 0.0001) increased. There was no significant change in discussion of vaccine benefits (48% vs. 51%) or common side effects (91% vs. 92%),screening for contraindications (71% vs. 77%), or distribution of written information (89% vs. 92%). More parents initiated vaccine questions postintervention (27% vs. 39%,p less than 0.01) and were more satisfied with vaccine-risk communication (8.1 vs. 8.9 on a 10-point scale, p less than 0.01). Average vaccine communication time increased from 16 to 22 seconds (p less than 0.01). (Contains 3 tables and 1 note.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 32
Entry Date: 2008
Accession Number: EJ813677
Database: ERIC