Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Exploring an algorithm to harmonize International Obesity Task Force and World Health Organization child overweight and obesity prevalence rates

Title: Exploring an algorithm to harmonize International Obesity Task Force and World Health Organization child overweight and obesity prevalence rates
Authors: Cole, Tim J.; Lobstein, Tim
Source: Pediatric Obesity ; volume 17, issue 7 ; ISSN 2047-6302 2047-6310
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Summary Background The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) and World Health Organization (WHO) body mass index (BMI) cut‐offs are widely used to assess child overweight, obesity and thinness prevalence, but the two references applied to the same children lead to different prevalence rates. Objectives To develop an algorithm to harmonize prevalence rates based on the IOTF and WHO cut‐offs, to make them comparable. Methods The cut‐offs are defined as age‐sex‐specific BMI z ‐scores, for example, WHO +1 SD for overweight. To convert an age‐sex‐specific prevalence rate based on reference cut‐off A to the corresponding prevalence based on reference cut‐off B, first back‐transform the z ‐score cut‐offs and to age‐sex‐specific BMI cut‐offs, then transform the BMIs to z ‐scores and using the opposite reference. These z ‐scores together define the distance between the two cut‐offs as the z ‐score difference . Prevalence in the target group based on cut‐off A is then transformed to a z ‐score, adjusted up or down according to and back‐transformed, and this predicts prevalence based on cut‐off B. The algorithm's performance was tested on 74 groups of children from 14 European countries. Results The algorithm performed well. The standard deviation (SD) of the difference between pairs of prevalence rates was 6.6% ( n = 604), while the residual SD, the difference between observed and predicted prevalence, was 2.3%, meaning that the algorithm explained 88% of the baseline variance. Conclusions The algorithm goes some way to addressing the problem of harmonizing overweight and obesity prevalence rates for children aged 2–18.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12905
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12905; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijpo.12905; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/ijpo.12905
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.142F5505
Database: BASE