| Relation: |
https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/2906/1132; Tonino P.A., Fearon W.F., De Bruyne B., Oldroyd K.G., Leesar M.A., Ver Lee P.N. et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study: fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010;55:2816– 2821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096; Pijls N.H., Fearon W.F., Tonino P.A., Siebert U., Ikeno F., Bornschein B. et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010;56:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012; Haney A.C., Salatzki J., Hund H., Friedrich M.G., Giannitsis E., Frey N. et al. Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023;10:1264374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374; Picano E., Ciampi Q., Gaibazzi N., Landi P., Carpeggiani C., Cortigiani L. et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2024;25(2):e65– e90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead250; Лупанов В.П. Выбор неинвазивной нагрузочной пробы в диагностике ишемической болезни сердца (научный обзор). Медицинский Совет. 2018;16:62–70. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-16-62-70; Nørgaard B.L., Jensen J.M., Blanke P., Sand N.P., Rabbat M., Leipsic J. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: The game changer in noninvasive testing. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2017;19:112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0923-1; Pijls N.H., de Bruyne B., Peels K., van der Voort P.H., Bonnier H.J., Bartunek J. et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;334:1703–1708. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199606273342604; Суюндукова А.Т., Демкин В.П., Мочула А.В., Гуля М.О., Мальцева А.Н., Завадовский К.В. Современные математические методы моделирования коронарного кровотока: история вопроса и клиническое значение. Кардиология. 2023;63(3):77–84. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2023.3.n1930; Pijls N.H., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., Peels K., Bracke F.A., Bonnier H.J. et al. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–3193. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3183; Bech G.J., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., de Muinck E.D., Hoorntje J.C., Escaned J. et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2928–2934. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.24.2928; Tonino P.A., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., Siebert U., Ikeno F., van' t Veer M. et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807611; Elbadawi A., Sedhom R., Ghoweba M., Etewa A.M., Kayani W., Rahman F. Contemporary use of coronary physiology in cardiology. Cardiol. Ther. 2023;12:589–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-02300329-2; De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., Kalesan B., Barbato E., Tonino P.A., Piroth Z. et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205361; Meuwissen M., Chamuleau S.A., Siebes M., Schotborgh C.E., Koch K.T., de Winter R.J. et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation. 2001;103:184–187. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.2.184; Meuwissen M., Siebes M., Chamuleau S., Tijssen J., Spaan J., Piek J. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity for hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2003;1:471–479. https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.1.3.471; Bishop A.H., Samady H. Fractional flow reserve: critical review of an important physiologic adjunct to angiography. Am. Heart J. 2004;147:792– 802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.009; Demkin V.P., Mochula A.V., Zavadovsky K.V., Suyundukova A.T., Gulya M.O., Maltseva A.N. The influence of dynamic blood viscosity on coronary blood flow in stenotic artery. Russ. Phys. J. 2022;64:2364– 2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-022-02590-9; Gashi K. The impact of model assumptions on coronary blood flow computations. [Phd. Thesis 1, Biomedical Engineering]. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. 2019. DOI:10.3929/ethz-b-000402106. URL: https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/127280784/20190626_Gashi.pdf (10.12.2024).; Akdi A., Çetin E.H., Çakmak Karaaslan Ö., Erdöl M.A., Özilhan M.O., Maden O., Aras D. The role of whole blood viscosity estimated by De Simone’s Formula in Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve. E. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;10(1):18–24. https://doi.org/10.32596/ejcm.galenos.2022.2021-11-059; Roux E., Bougaran P., Dufourcq P., Couffinhal T. Fluid shear stress sensing by the endothelial layer. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00861; Alexy T., Detterich J., Connes P., Toth K., Nader E., Kenyeres P. et al. Physical properties of blood and their relationship to clinical conditions. Front. Physiol. 2022;13:906768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.906768; Ahmed S. Study of blood flow with effects of slip in arterial stenosis due to presence of transverse magnetic field. Int. J. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2013;4:215–226. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijmit.v4i2.1902; Picart C., Piau J.M., Galliard H., Carpentier P. Human blood shear yield stress and its hematocrit dependence. J. Rheol. 1998;42:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550883; Clifford P.S. Local control of blood flow. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00074.2010; Popel A.S., Johnson P.C. Microcirculation and Hemorheology. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 2005;37(1):43–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.042604.133933; Nader E., Skinner S., Romana M., Fort R., Lemonne N., Guillot N. et al. Blood rheology: Key parameters, impact on blood flow, role in sickle cell disease and effects of exercise. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:1329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01329; Антонов В.Ф., Козлова Е.К., Черныш А.М. Физика и биофизика; 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа; 2023:472.; Mahalingam A., Gawandalkar U.U., Kini G., Buradi A., Araki T., Ikeda N. et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of turbulence transition on the hemodynamic parameters in human coronary arteries. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2016;6:208–220. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2016.03.08; Pandey R., Kumar M., Majdoubi J., Rahimi-Gorji M., Srivastav V.K. A review study on blood in human coronary artery: Numerical approach. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;187:105243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105243; James M.E., Papavassiliou D.V., O’Rear E.A. Use of computational fluid dynamics to analyze blood flow, hemolysis and sublethal damage to red blood cells in a bileaflet artificial heart valve. Fluids. 2019;4(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4010019; Jahangiri M., Saghafian M., Sadeghi M.R. Numerical study of turbulent pulsatile blood flow through stenosed artery using fluid-solid interaction. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015;2015:515613. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/515613; Cokelet G.R., Brown J.R., Codd S.L., Seymour J.D. Magnetic resonance microscopy determined velocity and hematocrit distributions in a Couette viscometer. Biorheology. 2005;42:385–399.; Balogh P., Bagchi P. The cell-free layer in simulated microvascular networks. J. Fluid Mech. 2019;864:768–806. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.45; Gracka M., Lima R., Miranda J.M., Student S., Melka B., Ostrowski Z. Red blood cells tracking and cell-free layer formation in a microchannel with hyperbolic contraction: A CFD model validation. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;226:107117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107117; Starodumov I., Makhaeva K., Zubarev A., Bessonov I., Sokolov S., Mikushin P. et al. Modeling of local hematocrit for blood flow in stenotic coronary vessels. Fluids. 2023;8:230. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8080230; Sulaiman N., Soon J., Leipsic J. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Curr. Radiol. Rep. 2016;4(8):46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-016-0170-z; Li Y., Chen H. The application of quantitative flow ratio via 3-dimensional coronary angiography in clinical cardiology: A review. Discov. Med. 2022;33:129–135. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36274241/ (11.12.2024).; Cortes C., Carrasco-Moraleja M., Aparisi A., Rodriguez-Gabella T., Campo A., Gutiérrez H. et al. Quantitative flow ratio-Meta-analysis and systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021;97(5):807–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28857; Hu F., Ding D., Westra J., Li Y., Yu W., Wang Z. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of optical flow ratio: an individual patient-data meta-analysis. EuroIntervention. 2023;19:e145–e154. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01098; Xing Z., Pei J., Huang J., Hu X., Gao S. Diagnostic performance of QFR for the evaluation of intermediate coronary artery stenosis confirmed by fractional flow reserve. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019;34:165–172. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0234; Huang J., Emori H., Ding D., Kubo T., Yu W., Huang P. et al. Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:568–576. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034; Asher A., Wragg A., Davies C. Review: FFRCT Changing the Face of Cardiac CT. Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep. 2020;13:38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-020-09548-w; Westerhof N., Boer C., Lamberts R.R., Sipkema P. Crosstalk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature. Physiol. Rev. 2006;86:1263– 1308. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00029.2005; Честухин В.В., Бляхман Ф.А. Коронарный парадокс. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2022;24(4):145–151. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2022-4-145-151; Mirramezani M., Diamond S.L., Litt H.I., Shadden S.C. Reduced order models for transstenotic pressure drop in the coronary arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 2019;141:031005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042184; Karthikeyan J.S. Effect of bolus viscosity on carbohydrate digestion and glucose absorption processes: an in vitro gastrointestinal study and development of a mathematical model. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Publication date: 2019/10. https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-fnpsan96; Fossan F.E., Mariscal-Harana J., Alastruey J., Hellevik L.R. Optimization of topological complexity for one-dimensional arterial blood flow models. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2018;15:20180546. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0546; Scoccia A., Bedogni F., Biscaglia S., Tebaldi M., Tumscitz C., Campo G. Angiography-based fractional flow reserve: state of the art. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2022;24:667–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01687-4; https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/2906 |