Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Old vs. New Local Ancestry Inference in HCHS/SOL: A Comparative Study

Title: Old vs. New Local Ancestry Inference in HCHS/SOL: A Comparative Study
Authors: Chen, Xueying; Wang, Hao; Broce, Iris; Dale, Anders; Yu, Bing; Zhou, Laura Y.; Li, Xihao; Argos, Maria; Daviglus, Martha L.; Cai, Jianwen; Franceschini, Nora; Sofer, Tamar
Contributors: Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
Source: PMC
Publisher Information: bioRxiv
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis: IUPUI Scholar Works
Subject Terms: Hispanic/Latino populations; Admixed populations; Local ancestries; Global ancestries
Description: Hispanic/Latino populations are admixed, with genetic contributions from multiple ancestral populations. Studies of genetic association in these admixed populations often use methods such as admixture mapping, which relies on inferred counts of "local" ancestry, i.e., of the source ancestral population at a locus. Local ancestries are inferred using external reference panels that represent ancestral populations, making the choice of inference method and reference panel critical. This study used a dataset of Hispanic/Latino individuals from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) to evaluate the "old" local ancestry inference performed using the state-of-the-art inference method, RFMix, alongside "new" inferences performed using Fast Local Ancestry Estimation (FLARE), which also used an updated reference panel. We compared their performance in terms of global and local ancestry correlations, as well as admixture mapping-based associations. Overall, the old RFMix and new FLARE inferences were highly similar for both global and local ancestries, with FLARE-inferred datasets yielding admixture mapping results consistent with those computed from RFMix. However, in some genomic regions the old and new local ancestries have relatively lower correlations (Pearson R < 0.9). Most of these genomic regions (86.42%) were mapped to either ENCODE blacklist regions, or to gene clusters, compared to 7.67% of randomly-matched regions with high correlations (Pearson R > 0.97) between old and new local ancestries.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Chen X, Wang H, Broce I, et al. Old vs. New Local Ancestry Inference in HCHS/SOL: A Comparative Study. Preprint. bioRxiv. 2025;2025.02.04.636481. Published 2025 Feb 8. doi:10.1101/2025.02.04.636481; https://hdl.handle.net/1805/46493
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/1805/46493
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.159D55BA
Database: BASE