| Title: |
The UMPIRE study: A first-in-human multicenter trial of bilateral subscalp monitoring for epileptic seizure detection |
| Authors: |
Halliday, AJ; Gillinder, L; Lai, A; Seneviratne, U; Fontenot, H; Cameron, T; McLean, K; Niemiec, A; Raghupathi, R; Ganguly, TM; Ellis, C; Conrad, EC; Briggs, R; Bulluss, K; Kwan, P; Perucca, P; O'Brien, TJ; McGonigal, A; Gutman, M; Papacostas, J; Fong, MWK; Lee, A; Crompton, DE; Laing, J; Wijayath, M; Morokoff, AP; Murphy, M; D'Souza, WJ; Cook, MJ |
| Publisher Information: |
Wiley |
| Publication Year: |
2025 |
| Collection: |
The University of Melbourne: Digital Repository |
| Description: |
OBJECTIVE: Patient self-report is known to be an inaccurate reflection of true seizure frequency in persons with epilepsy. The current study aimed to assess the safety and performance of the Minder system, a bilateral subscalp electroencephalographic (EEG) acquisition system for continuous long-term EEG recording. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter first-in-human study enrolled adult patients with focal or generalized epilepsy and at least two seizures per month. The primary outcome was adverse events (AEs) in the first 6 months of implantation. Secondary analyses determined whether normal neurophysiological signals, interictal discharges, and seizures seen on scalp video-EEG monitoring were identifiable on subscalp recordings, and signals were rated for clarity on subscalp and two-channel scalp EEG recordings (1 = not recognizable, 5 = clear). Subscalp data were reviewed in relation to events reported in 6-month seizures diaries. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects were implanted between November 2019 and July 2023. No serious device- or implant procedure-related AEs were reported. The most common device-related AEs were mild or moderate postsurgical pain, headache, or scalp pain/paresthesia (9/26, 35%). All sleep spindles, chewing artifacts, interictal discharges, and electrographic seizures observed on scalp recordings (25 seizures from eight patients) were identified on subscalp recordings and given higher clarity ratings compared to two-channel scalp recordings (median seizure clarity rating was 3 for both scalp and subscalp EEG, range = 1-5, p = .0025). Subscalp recordings captured seizures from diverse seizure focus locations, including frontal and mesial temporal seizure foci and hypothalamic hamartoma. Bilateral recording revealed clinically relevant findings not possible with unilateral recordings (6/26 patients, 23%). Findings of potential clinical utility were identified on manual review of 6-month recordings in most patients (23/26, 88%). SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates the safety and performance ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
0013-9580 |
| Relation: |
https://hdl.handle.net/11343/362752 |
| Availability: |
https://hdl.handle.net/11343/362752 |
| Rights: |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 ; CC BY-NC-ND |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.16436A2B |
| Database: |
BASE |