Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

A quantitative and qualitative assessment of differential privacy’s ability to support collaborative research using a real-world data analysis

Title: A quantitative and qualitative assessment of differential privacy’s ability to support collaborative research using a real-world data analysis
Authors: Gieser, David P; Arya, Ashna R; Smith, Rebecca Lee; Vozenilek, John A; Raman, Vishwanath; Handler, Jonathan A
Contributors: Senior Fellow’s Research; OSF Innovation; Jump Trading Simulation and Education Center
Source: JAMIA Open ; volume 8, issue 6 ; ISSN 2574-2531
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2025
Description: Objective Sharing clinical data for research that is both collaborative and privacy-preserving remains a challenge. Differential privacy (DP) offers a solution by introducing noise to query results. Using the PrivateSQL DP platform, this study assesses the resulting utility of differentially private data at different levels of aggregation through analyses of COVID-19 pandemic associations with new cancer diagnosis counts (NCCs). Materials and Methods Data from a multi-hospital system for adult (18–90 years) encounters from 2019-2021 with apparently new cancer diagnoses were extracted, then queried using standard SQL (“original”) and DP, each with 1-week and 4-week aggregations. Analyses on the 4 datasets included NCCs by year and multivariate regression models of associations between COVID-19 positivity rates (by county) and change in NCCs between pre- and post-COVID-19 start. Results NCCs dropped in 2020, rebounding in 2021. This same pattern was demonstrated in the 4-week, but not the 1-week, DP dataset. Confidence intervals were substantially narrower in regressions using original datasets compared to those using DP datasets, and narrower in DP dataset regressions using 4-week rather than 1-week aggregation. Post-hoc sensitivity analyses found significant associations with 2 variables of interest on the original datasets (though these have methodologic limitations), but not the DP datasets. Discussion DP reduces analytic accuracy to protect data privacy, but aggregation mitigated this tradeoff. Strategies for using DP in healthcare research and potential opportunities to enhance the DP platform were identified. Conclusion DP platform enhancements for hypothesis-driven medical studies may expand DP’s ability to support fruitful, cross-institutional research collaborations.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf144
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf144; https://academic.oup.com/jamiaopen/article-pdf/8/6/ooaf144/65248964/ooaf144.pdf
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.22063302
Database: BASE