Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparison of Tank and Battery Storages for Photovoltaic Water Pumping

Title: Comparison of Tank and Battery Storages for Photovoltaic Water Pumping
Authors: Soenen, Camille; Reinbold, Vincent; Meunier, Simon; Cherni, Judith, A; Darga, Arouna; Dessante, Philippe; Quéval, Loïc
Contributors: Imperial College London; Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris); Laboratoire Génie électrique et électronique de Paris (GeePs); CentraleSupélec-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source: ISSN: 1996-1073 ; Energies ; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03251689 ; Energies, 2021, 14 (9), pp.2483. ⟨10.3390/en14092483⟩.
Publisher Information: CCSD; MDPI
Publication Year: 2021
Subject Terms: batteries; storage technologies; system architectures; life-cycle cost; optimal sizing; photovoltaic water pumping; [PHYS]Physics [physics]
Description: International audience ; Photovoltaic water pumping systems (PVWPS) are a promising solution to improve domestic water access in low-income rural areas. It is challenging, however, to make them more affordable for the local communities. We develop here a comparative methodology to assess relevant features of both widely employed PVWPS architecture with water tank storage, and hardly used PVWPS architecture with a battery bank instead of tank storage. The quantitative comparison is carried out through techno-economic optimization, with the goal of minimizing the life cycle cost of PVWPS with constraints on the satisfaction of the water demand of local inhabitants and on the groundwater resource sustainability. It is aimed to support decision-makers in selecting most appropriate storage for domestic water supply projects. We applied the methodology in the rural village of Gogma, Burkina Faso. Results indicate that the life-cycle cost of an optimized PVWPS with batteries is $24.1k while it is $31.1k if a tank is used instead. Moreover, reduced impact on groundwater resources and greater modularity to adapt to evolving water demand is noted if using batteries. However, as batteries must be replaced regularly and recycled adequately, PVWPS’ financial accessibility could increase only if sustainable and efficient operation, maintenance, and recycling facilities for batteries were present or developed locally. View Full-Text
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.3390/en14092483
Availability: https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03251689; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03251689v1/document; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03251689v1/file/energies-14-02483.pdf; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092483
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.221C3B35
Database: BASE