Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Serratus anterior plane block alone, paravertebral block alone and their combination in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: the THORACOSOPIC double-blind, randomized trial

Title: Serratus anterior plane block alone, paravertebral block alone and their combination in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: the THORACOSOPIC double-blind, randomized trial
Authors: Leviel, Florent; Fourdrain, Alex; Delatre, Florian; De Dominicis, Florence; Lefebvre, Thomas; Bar, Stéphane; Alshatri, Hamza Yahia; Lorne, Emmanuel; Georges, Olivier; Berna, Pascal; Dupont, Hervé; Meynier, Jonathan; Abou-Arab, Osama
Contributors: Amiens Hospital University
Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ; volume 65, issue 4 ; ISSN 1873-734X
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2024
Description: OBJECTIVES Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) are well known to reduce pain levels after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, the relative efficacies of each block and a combination of the 2 have not been fully characterized. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of PVB alone, SAPB alone and the combination of PVB and SAPB with regard to the occurrence and intensity of pain after VATS. METHODS We conducted the THORACOSOPIC single-centre, double-blind, randomized trial in adult patients due to undergo elective VATS lung resection. The participants were randomized to PVB only, SAPB only and PVB + SAPB groups. The primary end-point was pain on coughing on admission to the postanaesthesia care unit. The secondary end-points were postoperative pain at rest and on coughing at other time points and the cumulative opioid consumption. Pain was scored on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS One-hundred and fifty-six patients (52 in each group) were included. On admission to the postanaesthesia care unit, the 3 groups did not differ significantly with regard to the pain on coughing: the visual analogue scale score was 3 (0–6), 4 (0–8) and 2 (0–6) in the PVB, SAPB and PVB + SAPB groups, respectively (P = 0.204). During postoperative care, the overall pain score was significantly lower in the SABP + PVP group at rest and on cough. CONCLUSIONS The combination of SABP + PVB could be beneficial for pain management in VATS in comparison to SABP or PVB alone.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae082
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae082/57116926/ezae082.pdf
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae082; https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezae082/57116926/ezae082.pdf; https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-pdf/65/4/ezae082/57358788/ezae082.pdf
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.24D2989D
Database: BASE