Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Multicenter evaluation of rapid BACpro® II for the accurate identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS

Title: Multicenter evaluation of rapid BACpro® II for the accurate identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS
Authors: Oviaño, Marina; Ingebretsen, André; Steffensen, Anne Katrine; Croxatto, Antony; Prod’hom, Guy; Quiroga, Lidia; Bou, Germán; Greub, Gilbert; Rodríguez-Temporal, David; Rodríguez-Sánchez, Belén
Source: 2075-4418.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
Description: The identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS has been shown to be the most impacting application of this methodology. In this study, a novel commercial method was evaluated in four clinical microbiology laboratories. Positive blood culture samples (n = 801) were processed using a rapid BACpro® II kit and then compared with the routine gold standard. A subset of monomicrobial BCs (n = 560) were analyzed in parallel with a Sepsityper® Kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and compared with the rapid BACpro® II kit. In addition, this kit was also compared with two different in-house methods. Overall, 80.0% of the monomicrobial isolates (609/761; 95% CI 71.5–88.5) were correctly identified by the rapid BACpro® II kit at the species level (92.3% of the Gram negative and 72.4% of the Gram positive bacteria). The comparison with the Sepsityper® Kit showed that the rapid BACpro® II kit generated higher rates of correct species-level identification for all categories (p > 0.0001), except for yeasts identified with score values > 1.7. It also proved superior to the ammonium chloride method (p > 0.0001), but the differential centrifugation method allowed for higher rates of correct identification for Gram negative bacteria (p > 0.1). The percentage of accurate species-level identification of Gram positive bacteria was particularly noteworthy in comparison with other commercial and in-house methods.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/10852/92901; 1975503; Diagnostics (Basel); 11; 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122251
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122251
Availability: http://hdl.handle.net/10852/92901; http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-95474; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122251
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.27B73C5
Database: BASE