Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Acoustic Pharyngometry: A Substitute for Drug‐Induced Sleep Endoscopy?

Title: Acoustic Pharyngometry: A Substitute for Drug‐Induced Sleep Endoscopy?
Authors: Friedman, Michael; Samuelson, Christian G.; Hamilton, Craig S.
Source: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery ; volume 147, issue S2 ; ISSN 0194-5998 1097-6817
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2012
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Objective Upper airway collapse measured using supine acoustic pharyngometry at respiratory residual volume (RV) has previously been correlated with obstructive sleep apnea‐hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) severity. We aim to assess the agreement between sites of maximal upper airway obstruction measured by supine acoustic pharyngometry and drug‐induced sleep‐endoscopy (DISE) in snoring/OSAHS patients. Method In this case series, 50 consecutive patients with known snoring/OSAHS underwent in‐office supine acoustic pharyngometry and DISE. Pharyngometric measurements at respiratory tidal volume were compared against the standard normal curve to establish airway landmarks. Sites of minimal cross‐sectional‐area at respiratory RV were compared with sites of maximal obstruction identified through DISE. Results Fifty patients (68% male, 32% female, age 47.3 ± 13.7, mean AHI 37.0 ± 26.8) were evaluated. All endoscopic assessments were performed by a single investigator (M.F.). Regions of maximal upper airway collapse per DISE were classified as retropalatal, mixed retropalatal and retroglossal, retroglossal, mixed retroglossal and retroepiglottic, or retroepiglottic. Graphical and numerical pharyngometric data were assessed by 3 investigators with complete agreement regarding regional collapse. Agreement between sites of maximal upper airway obstruction per DISE and regions of minimal cross‐sectional‐area per supine pharyngometry was 89.2% (95% CI 74.5, 95.9; P
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812451438a264
Availability: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599812451438a264; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599812451438a264
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.29643840
Database: BASE