Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

A complex ePrescribing antimicrobial stewardship-based (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals: mixed-methods feasibility trial results

Title: A complex ePrescribing antimicrobial stewardship-based (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals: mixed-methods feasibility trial results
Authors: Weir CJ; Hinder S; Adamestam I; Sharp R; Ennis H; Heed A; Williams R; Cresswell K; Dogar O; Pontefract S; Coleman J; Lilford R; Watson N; Slee A; Chuter A; Beggs J; Slight S; Mason J; Bates DW; Sheikh A
Source: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11 October 2024
Publisher Information: BioMed Central Ltd
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Newcastle University Library ePrints Service
Description: © 2024. The Author(s). BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistant infections cause over 700,000 deaths worldwide annually. As antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) helps minimise the emergence of antibiotic resistance resulting from inappropriate use of antibiotics in healthcare, we developed ePAMS+ (ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship), an ePrescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) system decision-support tool complemented by educational, behavioural and organisational elements. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomised before-and-after feasibility trial, implementing ePAMS+ in two English hospitals using the Cerner Millennium EPMA system. Wards of several specialties were included. Patient participants were blinded to whether ePAMS+ was in use; prescribers were not. A mixed-methods evaluation aimed to establish: acceptability and usability of ePAMS+ and trial processes; feasibility of ePAMS+ implementation and quantitative outcome recording; and a Fidelity Index measuring the extent to which ePAMS+ was delivered as intended. Longitudinal semi-structured interviews of doctors, nurses and pharmacists, alongside non-participant observations, gathered qualitative data; we extracted quantitative prescribing data from the EPMA system. Normal linear modelling of the defined daily dose (DDD) of antibiotic per admission quantified its variability, to inform sample size calculations for a future trial of ePAMS+ effectiveness. RESULTS: The research took place during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, from April 2021 to November 2022. 60 qualitative interviews were conducted (33 before ePAMS+ implementation, 27 after). 1,958 admissions (1,358 before ePAMS+ implementation; 600 after) included 24,884 antibiotic orders. Qualitative interviews confirmed that some aspects of ePAMS+ , its implementation and training were acceptable, while other features (e.g. enabling combinations of antibiotics to be prescribed) required further development. ePAMS+ uptake was low (28 antibiotic review records from 600 admissions; 0.047 records per ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: unknown
Relation: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/301759; https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=301759/C0D713A0-76F3-4E3C-ADE3-8095A5EAFA7F.pdf&pub_id=301759
Availability: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/301759
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.2B7E00C1
Database: BASE