| Title: |
Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue |
| Authors: |
Ubels, Sander; Matthée, Eric; Verstegen, Moniek; Klarenbeek, Bastiaan; Bouwense, Stefan; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I; Daams, Freek; Dekker, Jan Willem T; van Det, Marc J; van Esser, Stijn; Griffiths, Ewen A; Haveman, Jan Willem; Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard; Siersema, Peter D; Wijnhoven, Bas; Hannink, Gerjon; van Workum, Frans; Rosman, Camiel; TENTACLE – Esophagus collaborative group; Writing Committee; Heisterkamp, Joos; Polat, Fatih; Schouten, Jeroen; Singh, Pritam; Study collaborators; Gutschow, Christian A; Schmidt, Henner; Vetter, Diana |
| Source: |
Ubels, Sander; Matthée, Eric; Verstegen, Moniek; Klarenbeek, Bastiaan; Bouwense, Stefan; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I; Daams, Freek; Dekker, Jan Willem T; van Det, Marc J; van Esser, Stijn; Griffiths, Ewen A; Haveman, Jan Willem; Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard; Siersema, Peter D; Wijnhoven, Bas; Hannink, Gerjon; van Workum, Frans; Rosman, Camiel; TENTACLE – Esophagus collaborative group; Writing Committee; Heisterkamp, Joos; Polat, Fatih; Schouten, Jeroen; Singh, Pritam; Study collaborators; et al; Gutschow, Christian A; Schmidt, Henner; Vetter, Diana (2023). Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 49(5):974-982. |
| Publisher Information: |
Elsevier |
| Publication Year: |
2023 |
| Collection: |
University of Zurich (UZH): ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive |
| Subject Terms: |
Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery; 610 Medicine & health |
| Description: |
INTRODUCTION: Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences. METHODS: TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume ( |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| File Description: |
application/pdf |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
0748-7983 |
| Relation: |
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/276980/1/ZORA_276980.pdf; info:pmid/36732207; urn:issn:0748-7983 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.010 |
| Availability: |
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/276980/; https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/276980/1/ZORA_276980.pdf; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.010 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.2C0EF4F1 |
| Database: |
BASE |