Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Prevalence of co-occurring forms of intimate partner violence against women aged 15–49 and the role of education-related inequalities: analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys across 49 low-income and middle-income countries

Title: Prevalence of co-occurring forms of intimate partner violence against women aged 15–49 and the role of education-related inequalities: analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys across 49 low-income and middle-income countries
Authors: Zhao, S; Liu, S; Gao, J; Ma, N; Chen, S; Chandan, JS; Kim, R; Karoli, P; Niyi, JL; Rajeev, J; Zemene, MA; Khan, MN; Msuya, HM; Lu, C; Subramanian, SV; Cheng, F; Ji, JS; Tang, K; Geldsetzer, P; Li, Z
Publisher Information: Elsevier
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: The University of Melbourne: Digital Repository
Description: Background: Women experiencing co-occurring forms of intimate partner violence (IPV; ie, physical, sexual, and/or psychological) often face more severe psychological and health consequences than those experiencing a single form. However, research on IPV co-occurrence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. This study examines the prevalence of IPV co-occurrence in LMICs and its education-based inequalities. Methods: Data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys in 49 LMICs (2011–2023) were used. Our primary outcome was IPV co-occurrence, defined as a woman aged 15–49 ever experiencing any two or three forms of physical, sexual, or psychological IPV from her partner within the past year. We categorised IPV co-occurrence into four subtypes: co-occurrence of (1) physical and sexual IPV, (2) physical and psychological IPV, (3) sexual and psychological IPV, and (4) all three forms of IPV. We analysed the prevalence of IPV co-occurrence and its subtypes by women's education levels, calculating odds ratios to assess inequalities. Nonparametric restricted cubic splines were used to explore nonlinear relationships between education and IPV. Findings: The study included a total of 344,661 women. The weighted prevalence of IPV co-occurrence varied widely across countries—from 2.4% in Armenia to 38.9% in Papua New Guinea. Overall, women with no education were most at risk, experiencing an adjusted prevalence of 14.3% (95% CI: 13.3–15.2), compared to 11.8% (95% CI: 10.8–12.9) among those with primary education, 9.9% (95% CI: 9.3–10.6) for secondary education, and 5.3% (95% CI: 4.5–6.2) for higher education. The prevalence of IPV co-occurrence involving sexual IPV was highest among women with primary education, with 4.1% (95% CI: 3.4–4.8) reporting concurrent physical and sexual violence, compared to 1.5% (95% CI: 1.1–1.9) to 3.7% (95% CI: 3.2–4.1) among other education levels. Interpretation: IPV co-occurrence remains high, particularly among women with little or no education. ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
ISSN: 2589-5370
Relation: https://hdl.handle.net/11343/360230
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11343/360230
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 ; CC BY-NC-ND
Accession Number: edsbas.2D5A6E1
Database: BASE