Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

When is it acceptable to break the rules? Knowledge representation of moral judgements based on empirical data

Title: When is it acceptable to break the rules? Knowledge representation of moral judgements based on empirical data
Authors: Awad, Edmond; Levine, Sydney; Loreggia, Andrea; Mattei, Nicholas; Rahwan, Iyad; Rossi, Francesca; Talamadupula, Kartik; Tenenbaum, Joshua; Kleiman-Weiner, Max
Contributors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Source: Springer US
Publisher Information: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Description: Constraining the actions of AI systems is one promising way to ensure that these systems behave in a way that is morally acceptable to humans. But constraints alone come with drawbacks as in many AI systems, they are not flexible. If these constraints are too rigid, they can preclude actions that are actually acceptable in certain, contextual situations. Humans, on the other hand, can often decide when a simple and seemingly inflexible rule should actually be overridden based on the context. In this paper, we empirically investigate the way humans make these contextual moral judgements, with the goal of building AI systems that understand when to follow and when to override constraints. We propose a novel and general preference-based graphical model that captures a modification of standard dual process theories of moral judgment. We then detail the design, implementation, and results of a study of human participants who judge whether it is acceptable to break a well-established rule: no cutting in line. We then develop an instance of our model and compare its performance to that of standard machine learning approaches on the task of predicting the behavior of human participants in the study, showing that our preference-based approach more accurately captures the judgments of human decision-makers. It also provides a flexible method to model the relationship between variables for moral decision-making tasks that can be generalized to other settings.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems; https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155691; PUBLISHER_CC
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155691
Rights: Creative Commons Attribution ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; The Author(s)
Accession Number: edsbas.2F9C15A0
Database: BASE