| Title: |
Impact of Automated Prognostication on Traumatic Brain Injury Care: A Focus Group Study |
| Authors: |
Hibi, Atsuhiro; Cusimano, Michael D.; Bilbily, Alexander; Krishnan, Rahul G.; Tyrrell, Pascal N. |
| Source: |
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques ; volume 51, issue 6, page 819-827 ; ISSN 0317-1671 2057-0155 |
| Publisher Information: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| Publication Year: |
2024 |
| Description: |
Background: Prognosticating outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is challenging due to the required specialized skills and variability among clinicians. Recent attempts to standardize TBI prognosis have leveraged machine learning (ML) methodologies. This study evaluates the necessity and influence of ML-assisted TBI prognostication through healthcare professionals’ perspectives via focus group discussions. Methods: Two virtual focus groups included ten key TBI care stakeholders (one neurosurgeon, two emergency clinicians, one internist, two radiologists, one registered nurse, two researchers in ML and healthcare and one patient representative). They answered six open-ended questions about their perceptions and potential ML use in TBI prognostication. Transcribed focus group discussions were thematically analyzed using qualitative data analysis software. Results: The study captured diverse perceptions and interests in TBI prognostication across clinical specialties. Notably, certain clinicians who currently do not prognosticate expressed an interest in doing so independently provided they had access to ML support. Concerns included ML’s accuracy and the need for proficient ML researchers in clinical settings. The consensus suggested using ML as a secondary consultation tool and promoting collaboration with internal or external research resources. Participants believed ML prognostication could enhance disposition planning and standardize care regardless of clinician expertise or injury severity. There was no evidence of perceived bias or interference during the discussions. Conclusion: Our findings revealed an overall positive attitude toward ML-based prognostication. Despite raising multiple concerns, the focus group discussions were particularly valuable in underscoring the potential of ML in democratizing and standardizing TBI prognosis practices. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1017/cjn.2024.24 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.24; https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0317167124000246 |
| Rights: |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.397E636B |
| Database: |
BASE |