Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

D-PRISM: a global survey-based study to assess diagnostic and treatment approaches in pneumonia managed in intensive care

Title: D-PRISM: a global survey-based study to assess diagnostic and treatment approaches in pneumonia managed in intensive care
Authors: Reyes L.F.; Serrano-Mayorga C.C.; Zhang Z.; Tsuji I.; De Pascale G.; Prieto V.E.; Mer M.; Sheehan E.; Nasa P.; Zangana G.; Avanti K.; Tabah A.; Shrestha G.S.; Bracht H.; Fatoni A.Z.; Abidi K.; bin Sulaiman H.; Eshwara V.K.; De Bus L.; Hayashi Y.; Korkmaz P.; Ait Hssain A.; Buetti N.
Publisher Information: Critical Care
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
Subject Terms: Antimicrobials; Bronchoscopy; Community-Acquired; Hospital-Acquired
Description: Background: Pneumonia remains a significant global health concern, particularly among those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the availability of international guidelines, there remains heterogeneity in clinical management. The D-PRISM study aimed to develop a global overview of how pneumonias (i.e., community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), and Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)) are diagnosed and treated in the ICU and compare differences in clinical practice worldwide. Methods: The D-PRISM study was a multinational, survey-based investigation to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in the ICU. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to intensive care clinicians from 72 countries between September to November 2022. The questionnaire included sections on professional profiles, current clinical practice in diagnosing and managing CAP, HAP, and VAP, and the availability of microbiology diagnostic tests. Multivariable analysis using multiple regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between reported antibiotic duration and organisational variables collected in the study. Results: A total of 1296 valid responses were collected from ICU clinicians, spread between low-and-middle income (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC), with LMIC respondents comprising 51% of respondents. There is heterogeneity across the diagnostic processes, including clinical assessment, where 30% (389) did not consider radiological evidence essential to diagnose pneumonia, variable collection of microbiological samples, and use and practice in bronchoscopy. Microbiological diagnostics were least frequently available in low and lower-middle-income nation settings. Modal intended antibiotic treatment duration was 5¿7 days for all types of pneumonia. Shorter durations of antibiotic treatment were associated with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs, high national income status, and formal intensive care training. Conclusions: This study highlighted variations ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Critical Care vol. 28 n. 1; https://hdl.handle.net/10818/63258
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05180-y
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/10818/63258; https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85210005694&doi=10.1186%2fs13054-024-05180-y&partnerID=40&md5=2a7eb5adf38bae66927202790c43f648; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05180-y
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ; openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.39C73CF8
Database: BASE