Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Sodium citrate versus sodium bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial

Title: Sodium citrate versus sodium bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial
Authors: Sorohan, Bogdan Marian; Obrișcă, Bogdan; Jurubiță, Roxana; Lupușoru, Gabriela; Achim, Camelia; Andronesi, Andreea; Frățilă, Georgiana; Berechet, Andreea; Micu, Georgia; Ismail, Gener
Source: Medicine ; volume 103, issue 10, page e37475 ; ISSN 0025-7974 1536-5964
Publisher Information: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Year: 2024
Description: Background: Metabolic acidosis (MA) is frequently associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Our aim was to compare the effect of oral sodium citrate (SC) with that of oral sodium bicarbonate (SB) on renal function and serum bicarbonate correction, as well as to evaluate their safety profile in patients with MA of CKD. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized 1:1, parallel, controlled, unblinded clinical trial of 124 patients with MA and CKD stages 3b and 4. The primary outcome was the mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The secondary outcomes were mean change in serum bicarbonate level, eGFR decrease by 30%, eGFR decrease by 50%, dialysis, death or prolonged hospitalization, and a combined endpoint. Results: No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of mean eGFR change [adjusted mean difference = −0.99 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI: −2.51 to 0.93, P = .20)]. We observed a mean serum bicarbonate change of 6.15 mmol/L [(95% CI: 5.55–6.74), P < .001] in the SC group and of 6.19 mmol/L [(95% CI: 5.54–6.83), P < .001] in the SB group, but no significant difference between the 2 groups [adjusted mean difference = 0.31 mmol/L (−0.22 to 0.85), P = .25]. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed similar risks regarding eGFR decrease by 30% ( P = .77), eGFR decrease by 50% ( P = .50), dialysis ( P = .85), death or prolonged hospitalization ( P = .29), and combined endpoint ( P = .57). Study drug discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly more common in the SB group (17.7% vs 4.8%, P = .02). Conclusions: SC and SB have a similar effect on kidney function decline, both improve serum bicarbonate level, but SB is associated with higher rates of medication discontinuation due to adverse events.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037475
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037475
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037475; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/MD.0000000000037475
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.3D75DBB9
Database: BASE