Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Dead Sea salt irrigations vs saline irrigations with nasal steroids for symptomatic treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, prospective double‐blind study

Title: Dead Sea salt irrigations vs saline irrigations with nasal steroids for symptomatic treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, prospective double‐blind study
Authors: Friedman, Michael; Hamilton, Craig; Samuelson, Christian G.; Maley, Alexander; Wilson, Meghan N.; Venkatesan, T.K.; Joseph, Ninos J.
Source: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology ; volume 2, issue 3, page 252-257 ; ISSN 2042-6976 2042-6984
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2012
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Background: Intranasal steroids are 1 of the most frequently prescribed medications for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and saline irrigations are commonly used as an adjunct to medical therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of Dead Sea salt (DSS) irrigations and DSS nasal spray vs saline irrigations and topical nasal steroid spray in the treatment of symptoms of CRS. Methods: A total of 145 symptomatic adult patients without acute infection were initially enrolled and 114 completed the study. Patients completed a Sino‐Nasal Outcomes Test 20 (SNOT‐20) survey (primary outcome metric) and underwent endonasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, and smell testing (secondary outcome metrics). Patients were randomized to 2 groups. The experimental group (n = 59) self‐administered hypertonic DSS spray and DSS irrigation; the control group (n = 55) self‐administered fluticasone spray and hypertonic saline irrigation and spray. Patients and staff were blinded to group assignment. Outcomes were reassessed at 4 weeks. Results: The 2 groups were homogeneous with respect to pretreatment primary and secondary outcome metrics. Dropout rates were 30% in the DSS group and 36.6% in the control group. Both groups showed significant improvement in mean SNOT‐20 scores following treatment; however, the degree of improvement was not significantly different between groups ( p = 0.082). There were no significant changes in secondary outcome metrics between the 2 groups. Conclusion: For patients with CRS, treatment with DSS irrigations and sprays appears as effective for symptom reduction as a combination of hypertonic saline irrigations and sprays and a topical steroid spray. © 2011 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21003
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21003; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Falr.21003; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/alr.21003
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.3EC1EE85
Database: BASE